| description |
Ennen OSTRC-H terveyskyselyä vammamonitorointi on perustunut pääosin ajan menettämisen rekisteröimiseen. OSTRC-H terveyskysely mittaa ajan menettämisen lisäksi terveysongelman oireiden vakavuusastetta. Vammamonitorointi on tärkeää urheiluvammojen minimoimisen sekä kaiken tyyppisten terveysongelmien identifioimisen vuoksi. Tämän tutkimuksen tarkoituksena oli arvioida ja mitata OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskyselyn kulttuurista sopeutumista, sisältövaliditeettia ja reliabiliteettia toistettavuuden ja sisäisen yhdenmukaisuuden osalta.
Tutkimukseen osallistui yhteensä (N = 91) nuorta 13–35-vuotiasta kilpaurheilun harrastajaa pääosin Jyväskylän urheiluakatemiaverkosta. Urheilijat valittiin tutkimukseen eri lajeista (koripallo, telinevoimistelu, uinti, jalkapallo, jääkiekko, yleisurheilu ja taitoluistelu). Tutkimuksessa OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskyselyn sisältövaliditeetin testaaminen tehtiin mixed methods -lähestymistavalla, jossa yhdistettiin aineiston kvantifiointi ja teorialähtöinen sisällönanalyysi. OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskyselyn reliabiliteetin arvioinnissa testattiin sisäistä yhdenmukaisuutta sekä testi-uusintatestin toistettavuutta. Sisäisen yhdenmukaisuuden arvioinnissa käytettiin Cronbach’s alfaa ja testi-uusintatestin toistettavuutta arvioitiin Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ja Cohenin kappa -menetelmillä.
OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskyselyn sisältövaliditeetin tarkastelussa koehenkilöitä oli (n = 8). Reliabiliteetin tarkastelussa koehenkilöitä oli (n = 57). Sisältövaliditeetin osalta kaikki kahdeksan urheilijaa piti OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskyselyä yleisesti pätevänä omalle urheilulajilleen. Reliabiliteetin analyysissa, joka sisälsi kaikki koehenkilöt (n = 57), sisäisen yhdenmukaisuuden reliabiliteetti oli (α = 0,95 95 % CI: 0,91–0,95), testi-uusintatestin reliabiliteetti oli (ICC = 0,92 95 % CI: 0,87–0,95) ja (Cohenin kappa 0,31 95 % CI 0,20–0,44). Testin ja uusintatestin välillä oli tilastollisesti merkitsevä ero vamman vakavuuspisteissä (p = 0,047). Reliabiliteetin analyysissa, joka sisälsi koehenkilöt, joiden terveydentila ei ollut muuttunut testi-uusintatestin aikana (n = 31) sisäisen yhdenmukaisuuden reliabiliteetti oli (α = 0,97 95 % CI: 0,93–0,97), testi-uusintatestin reliabiliteetti oli (ICC = 0,99 95 % CI: 0,98–0,99) ja (Cohenin kappa 0,57 95 % CI 0,35–0,79). Testin ja uusintatestin välillä ei ollut tilastollisesti merkitsevää eroa vamman vakavuuspisteissä (p = 0,683). Reliabiliteetin analyysissa, johon sisällytettiin vain koehenkilöt, joiden terveydentilassa tapahtui muutoksia (n =26) testi-uusintatestin aikana, sisäisen yhdenmukaisuuden reliabiliteetti oli (α = 0,85 95 % CI: 0,79–0,85), testi-uusintatestin reliabiliteetti oli (ICC = 0,16 95 % CI: -0,79–0,61) ja (Cohenin kappa 0,031 95 % CI -0,10–0,05). Testin ja uusintatestin välillä ei ollut tilastollisesti merkitsevää eroa vamman vakavuuspisteissä (p = 0,337).
Tutkimuksen tulokset ovat samansuuntaisia muiden maiden OSTRC-H terveyskyselyistä tehtyjen tutkimusten kanssa. OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskysely näyttäisi olevan sisältövalidi ja korkean reliabiliteetin mittari arvioimaan suomalaisten nuorten urheilijoiden terveysongelmia. Jatkossa tarvitaan tutkimusta OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskyselyn ennustevaliditeetin testaamisesta sekä kyselyn soveltuvuudesta eri väestönryhmissä Suomessa.
Before the development of the OSTRC-H questionnaire injury monitoring was mainly based on recording the time loss. The OSTRC-H questionnaire measures also the severity of health problems. This kind of injury monitoring is important for minimizing sport injuries and identifying all kind of sport injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate cultural adaptation and establish content validity and reliability of the OSTRC-H (fin) questionnaire. Reliability testing focused on test-retest and internal consistency.
(N = 91) young athletes aged 13–35 mostly actively training youth and senior athletes training in Jyväskylä participated in the study. Athletes were selected for study from different sports (basketball, gymnastics, swimming, football, ice hockey, track and field athletics and figure skating). The content validity was analysed by using mixed methods -approach. Quantification and theoretical content analysis were used to analyse the data. In the measurement of reliability, the OSTRC-H (fin) questionnaire was analysed using internal consistency and test-retest measurements. Chronbach alfa was used to evaluate internal consistency and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and Cohens kappa methods was used to test-retest analysis.
(n = 8) athletes participated in the test of content validity and reliability testing was done in (n = 57). All eight athletes agreed that the questions in the form were relevant to their sport. In the reliability analysis, including all participants (n = 57) internal consistency reliability was (α 0.95 95 % CI: 0.91–0.95), test-retest reliability was (ICC 0.92 95 % CI: 0.87–0.95) and (Cohens kappa 0,31 95 % CI 0.20–0.44). There was difference between test and retest in relation to the severity score (p = 0.047). In the reliability analysis, that only included subjects who did not change health condition (n = 31) from the test to the retest internal consistency reliability was (α 0.97 95 % CI: 0.93–0.97), test-retest reliability was (ICC 0.99 95 % CI: 0.98–0.99) and (Cohens kappa 0.57 95 % CI 0.35–0.79). There was no difference between test and retest in relation to the severity score (p = 0.683). In the reliability analysis, that include subjects who had changes in health condition (n =26) during test-retest internal consistency reliability was (α 0.85 95 % CI: 0.79–0.85), test-retest reliability was (ICC 0.16 95 % CI: -0.79–0.61) and (Cohens kappa 0.031 95 % CI -0.10–0.05). There was no difference between test and retest in relation to the severity score (p = 0.377).
The results from this study are in line with the data from the previously translated versions of the OSTRC-H health surveys in other countries. The OSTRC-H (fin) questionnaire would seem to be a content valid and high reliability indicator for evaluating the health problems among young Finnish athletes. Future research should focus on testing the predictive validity of the OSTRC-H (fin) questionnaire and its suitability in different populations.
|
| fullrecord |
[{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Waller, Ben", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Virta, Ville", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2020-03-02T07:02:14Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2020-03-02T07:02:14Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2019", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/68014", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Ennen OSTRC-H terveyskysely\u00e4 vammamonitorointi on perustunut p\u00e4\u00e4osin ajan menett\u00e4misen rekister\u00f6imiseen. OSTRC-H terveyskysely mittaa ajan menett\u00e4misen lis\u00e4ksi terveysongelman oireiden vakavuusastetta. Vammamonitorointi on t\u00e4rke\u00e4\u00e4 urheiluvammojen minimoimisen sek\u00e4 kaiken tyyppisten terveysongelmien identifioimisen vuoksi. T\u00e4m\u00e4n tutkimuksen tarkoituksena oli arvioida ja mitata OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskyselyn kulttuurista sopeutumista, sis\u00e4lt\u00f6validiteettia ja reliabiliteettia toistettavuuden ja sis\u00e4isen yhdenmukaisuuden osalta. \n\nTutkimukseen osallistui yhteens\u00e4 (N = 91) nuorta 13\u201335-vuotiasta kilpaurheilun harrastajaa p\u00e4\u00e4osin Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n urheiluakatemiaverkosta. Urheilijat valittiin tutkimukseen eri lajeista (koripallo, telinevoimistelu, uinti, jalkapallo, j\u00e4\u00e4kiekko, yleisurheilu ja taitoluistelu). Tutkimuksessa OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskyselyn sis\u00e4lt\u00f6validiteetin testaaminen tehtiin mixed methods -l\u00e4hestymistavalla, jossa yhdistettiin aineiston kvantifiointi ja teorial\u00e4ht\u00f6inen sis\u00e4ll\u00f6nanalyysi. OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskyselyn reliabiliteetin arvioinnissa testattiin sis\u00e4ist\u00e4 yhdenmukaisuutta sek\u00e4 testi-uusintatestin toistettavuutta. Sis\u00e4isen yhdenmukaisuuden arvioinnissa k\u00e4ytettiin Cronbach\u2019s alfaa ja testi-uusintatestin toistettavuutta arvioitiin Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ja Cohenin kappa -menetelmill\u00e4.\n\nOSTRC-H (fin) terveyskyselyn sis\u00e4lt\u00f6validiteetin tarkastelussa koehenkil\u00f6it\u00e4 oli (n = 8). Reliabiliteetin tarkastelussa koehenkil\u00f6it\u00e4 oli (n = 57). Sis\u00e4lt\u00f6validiteetin osalta kaikki kahdeksan urheilijaa piti OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskysely\u00e4 yleisesti p\u00e4tev\u00e4n\u00e4 omalle urheilulajilleen. Reliabiliteetin analyysissa, joka sis\u00e4lsi kaikki koehenkil\u00f6t (n = 57), sis\u00e4isen yhdenmukaisuuden reliabiliteetti oli (\u03b1 = 0,95 95 % CI: 0,91\u20130,95), testi-uusintatestin reliabiliteetti oli (ICC = 0,92 95 % CI: 0,87\u20130,95) ja (Cohenin kappa 0,31 95 % CI 0,20\u20130,44). Testin ja uusintatestin v\u00e4lill\u00e4 oli tilastollisesti merkitsev\u00e4 ero vamman vakavuuspisteiss\u00e4 (p = 0,047). Reliabiliteetin analyysissa, joka sis\u00e4lsi koehenkil\u00f6t, joiden terveydentila ei ollut muuttunut testi-uusintatestin aikana (n = 31) sis\u00e4isen yhdenmukaisuuden reliabiliteetti oli (\u03b1 = 0,97 95 % CI: 0,93\u20130,97), testi-uusintatestin reliabiliteetti oli (ICC = 0,99 95 % CI: 0,98\u20130,99) ja (Cohenin kappa 0,57 95 % CI 0,35\u20130,79). Testin ja uusintatestin v\u00e4lill\u00e4 ei ollut tilastollisesti merkitsev\u00e4\u00e4 eroa vamman vakavuuspisteiss\u00e4 (p = 0,683). Reliabiliteetin analyysissa, johon sis\u00e4llytettiin vain koehenkil\u00f6t, joiden terveydentilassa tapahtui muutoksia (n =26) testi-uusintatestin aikana, sis\u00e4isen yhdenmukaisuuden reliabiliteetti oli (\u03b1 = 0,85 95 % CI: 0,79\u20130,85), testi-uusintatestin reliabiliteetti oli (ICC = 0,16 95 % CI: -0,79\u20130,61) ja (Cohenin kappa 0,031 95 % CI -0,10\u20130,05). Testin ja uusintatestin v\u00e4lill\u00e4 ei ollut tilastollisesti merkitsev\u00e4\u00e4 eroa vamman vakavuuspisteiss\u00e4 (p = 0,337).\nTutkimuksen tulokset ovat samansuuntaisia muiden maiden OSTRC-H terveyskyselyist\u00e4 tehtyjen tutkimusten kanssa. OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskysely n\u00e4ytt\u00e4isi olevan sis\u00e4lt\u00f6validi ja korkean reliabiliteetin mittari arvioimaan suomalaisten nuorten urheilijoiden terveysongelmia. Jatkossa tarvitaan tutkimusta OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskyselyn ennustevaliditeetin testaamisesta sek\u00e4 kyselyn soveltuvuudesta eri v\u00e4est\u00f6nryhmiss\u00e4 Suomessa.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Before the development of the OSTRC-H questionnaire injury monitoring was mainly based on recording the time loss. The OSTRC-H questionnaire measures also the severity of health problems. This kind of injury monitoring is important for minimizing sport injuries and identifying all kind of sport injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate cultural adaptation and establish content validity and reliability of the OSTRC-H (fin) questionnaire. Reliability testing focused on test-retest and internal consistency.\n\n(N = 91) young athletes aged 13\u201335 mostly actively training youth and senior athletes training in Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4 participated in the study. Athletes were selected for study from different sports (basketball, gymnastics, swimming, football, ice hockey, track and field athletics and figure skating). The content validity was analysed by using mixed methods -approach. Quantification and theoretical content analysis were used to analyse the data. In the measurement of reliability, the OSTRC-H (fin) questionnaire was analysed using internal consistency and test-retest measurements. Chronbach alfa was used to evaluate internal consistency and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and Cohens kappa methods was used to test-retest analysis. \n\n(n = 8) athletes participated in the test of content validity and reliability testing was done in (n = 57). All eight athletes agreed that the questions in the form were relevant to their sport. In the reliability analysis, including all participants (n = 57) internal consistency reliability was (\u03b1 0.95 95 % CI: 0.91\u20130.95), test-retest reliability was (ICC 0.92 95 % CI: 0.87\u20130.95) and (Cohens kappa 0,31 95 % CI 0.20\u20130.44). There was difference between test and retest in relation to the severity score (p = 0.047). In the reliability analysis, that only included subjects who did not change health condition (n = 31) from the test to the retest internal consistency reliability was (\u03b1 0.97 95 % CI: 0.93\u20130.97), test-retest reliability was (ICC 0.99 95 % CI: 0.98\u20130.99) and (Cohens kappa 0.57 95 % CI 0.35\u20130.79). There was no difference between test and retest in relation to the severity score (p = 0.683). In the reliability analysis, that include subjects who had changes in health condition (n =26) during test-retest internal consistency reliability was (\u03b1 0.85 95 % CI: 0.79\u20130.85), test-retest reliability was (ICC 0.16 95 % CI: -0.79\u20130.61) and (Cohens kappa 0.031 95 % CI -0.10\u20130.05). There was no difference between test and retest in relation to the severity score (p = 0.377).\n\nThe results from this study are in line with the data from the previously translated versions of the OSTRC-H health surveys in other countries. The OSTRC-H (fin) questionnaire would seem to be a content valid and high reliability indicator for evaluating the health problems among young Finnish athletes. Future research should focus on testing the predictive validity of the OSTRC-H (fin) questionnaire and its suitability in different populations.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Miia Hakanen (mihakane@jyu.fi) on 2020-03-02T07:02:14Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2020-03-02T07:02:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2019", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "80", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "fin", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "kulttuurinen sopeutuminen", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskysely", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "sis\u00e4lt\u00f6validiteetti", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "OSTRC-H (fin) terveyskyselyn kulttuurinen sopeutuminen sek\u00e4 validiteetin ja reliabiliteetin testaaminen", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202003022237", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Liikuntatieteellinen tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Liikunta- ja terveystieteet", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Sport and Health Sciences", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Fysioterapia", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Physiotherapy", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "50422", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "urheiluvammat", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "kyselytutkimus", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "reliabiliteetti", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "validiteetti", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.okm", "value": "G2", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "okm", "schema": "dc"}]
|