| fullrecord |
[{"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "M\u00e4kinen, Teemu", "language": null, "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2013-04-04T21:10:47Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2013-04-04T21:10:47Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2013", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.other", "value": "oai:jykdok.linneanet.fi:1257808", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/41137", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Tutkielmani tarkoituksena on tarkastella vuoden 2001 syyskuun 11. terroristi-iskuja\nseuranneen USA Patriot Actin parlamentaarista k\u00e4sittely\u00e4 ja laista k\u00e4ytyj\u00e4 debatteja\nYhdysvaltain kongressin edustajainhuoneessa lokakuussa 2001. Teht\u00e4v\u00e4ni on selvitt\u00e4\u00e4\nretorista analyysia k\u00e4ytt\u00e4en miten Patriot Actia edustajainhuoneessa puolustettiin ja\nvastustettiin, ottaen huomioon lain poliittisen ja historiallisen kontekstin. Yhdysvallat\njoutui vuonna 2001 poikkeukselliseen tilanteeseen. Syyskuun terrori-iskujen kaltaista\nhy\u00f6kk\u00e4yst\u00e4 Yhdysvaltoja vastaan ei ollut tehty sitten Pearl Harborin vuonna 1941.\nVastauksena kriisiin Yhdysvaltain hallitus esitti kongressille hyv\u00e4ksytt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi Patriot Actin,\njoka on saanut osakseen kritiikki\u00e4 sen vaikutuksesta yksil\u00f6nvapauksille ja perustuslaille.\nTutkimuksessa keskeiseksi nousevat lains\u00e4\u00e4d\u00e4nn\u00f6n puolustajien asettamat kielelliset\nraamit. Kielellisill\u00e4 raameilla pyrit\u00e4\u00e4n luomaan kuva todellisuudesta, jonka pohjalta\np\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kset tulee tehd\u00e4. Patriot Actin tapauksessa luotiin kuva sotatilasta, jossa Patriot Act\nn\u00e4htiin ratkaisuna tulevien iskujen est\u00e4miseksi, ja vastaavasti lain hylk\u00e4\u00e4minen johtaisi\nuusiin, kenties entist\u00e4 pahempiin iskuihin. Jos vastustus hyv\u00e4ksyy premissin sotatilasta, on\nsen hyv\u00e4ksytt\u00e4v\u00e4 my\u00f6s se todellisuuden tulkinta, ett\u00e4 lain vastustus johtaa uusiin iskuihin.\nN\u00e4in vastustus joutui argumentaatiossaan kiert\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4n puolustuksen asettamat kielelliset\nraamit sotatilasta, vastustajien tukeutuessa vahvasti amerikkalaisiin poliittisiin pyhimyksiin\nja perimm\u00e4isiin ideaaleihin, sek\u00e4 historiallisten esimerkkien avulla kyseenalaistamaan\ntilanteen ainutlaatuisuus. Tutkielmani tuloksista on n\u00e4ht\u00e4viss\u00e4, ett\u00e4 Patriot Actista\nkeskusteltaessa abstrakti vapauden k\u00e4site ei ole argumenttina riitt\u00e4v\u00e4 voittamaan\nkonkreettiseen turvallisuuden tunteeseen vetoavaa argumentointia.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "The purpose of this paper is to examine parliamentary procedures and debates of USA Patriot Act in the United States House of Representatives after the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Using the method of rhetorical analysis, my goal is to find out how the Patriot Act legislation was defended and opposed, taking into consideration the political and historical context surrounding the legislation. United States faced a very new kind of situation in September 2001. Last incident of this magnitude was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. United States government responded to 9/11 by introducing the USA Patriot Act to the Congress. The legislation has since faced criticism for its effects on individual rights and the constitution. An essential aspect of this study is the use of linguistic frames. Linguistic frames are used to create an image of reality to base future decisions on. The reality created around the Patriot Act was one of state-of-war, in which the Patriot Act legislation was seen as the solution to prevent future attacks, while rejecting the legislation would undoubtably lead to another even more destructive attack. If Patriot Act's opponents choose to accept the premise of state-of-war they also accept the interpretation of the reality in which rejecting the legislation would lead to another strike against the United States. Thus, the opponents of Patriot Act had to try to circumvent the frames set by proponents of the legislation. In doing so, the opponents of the Patriot Act based their arguments in the Founding Fathers and the fundamental political ideals of the United States. Historical examples were also used to deny the uniqueness of the situation. As a conclusion, I argue that when discussing USA Patriot Act the abstract concept of freedom is not strong enough argument to overcome arguments based on concrete desire for security.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted using Plone Publishing form by Teemu M\u00e4kinen (tepemaki) on 2013-04-04 21:10:47.138411. Form: Lukemisen kehityspolu 1. - 4. -luokkalaisilla lapsilla (https://kirjasto.jyu.fi/julkaisut/julkaisulomakkeet/pro-gradu-lomake-1-tekijae). JyX data:", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by jyx lomake-julkaisija (jyx-julkaisija@noreply.fi) on 2013-04-04T21:10:47Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 2\nURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201304051390.pdf: 401777 bytes, checksum: 743d57c71c252d5b4045e859d0892feb (MD5)\nlicense.html: 107 bytes, checksum: a7d86e598caa500b1b433bbb9dc8ef1c (MD5)", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2013-04-04T21:10:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2\nURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201304051390.pdf: 401777 bytes, checksum: 743d57c71c252d5b4045e859d0892feb (MD5)\nlicense.html: 107 bytes, checksum: a7d86e598caa500b1b433bbb9dc8ef1c (MD5)\n Previous issue date: 2013", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "84 sivua", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "fin", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Patriot Act", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "USA Patriot Actin parlamentaarisen k\u00e4sittelyn retorinen analyysi Yhdysvaltain edustajainhuoneessa", "language": null, "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201304051390", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Social Sciences", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Valtio-oppi", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Political Science", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.updated", "value": "2013-04-04T21:10:47Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "updated", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "208", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "terrorismi", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "retoriikka", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "lains\u00e4\u00e4d\u00e4nt\u00f6", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "Yhdysvallat", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.okm", "value": "G2", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "okm", "schema": "dc"}]
|