Stakeholder relations in macro-regional science cooperation case study

Tutkimuksen tehtävänä on selvittää BONUS- Itämeren tutkimusrahoitusohjelman sidosryhmäsuhteita. Tutkimus on toteutettu ajankohtana kesä 2010 – syksy 2011, ja se sijoittui BONUS- ohjelman strategiseen vaiheeseen, jonka aikana rakennettiin strategista tutkimusohjelma ja vahvistettiin sidosryhmäsuhteit...

Täydet tiedot

Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijä: Alaranta, Sanna
Muut tekijät: Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos, Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylän yliopisto
Aineistotyyppi: Pro gradu
Kieli:eng
Julkaistu: 2011
Aiheet:
Linkit: https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/40075
_version_ 1828193138589564928
author Alaranta, Sanna
author2 Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta Faculty of Social Sciences Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylän yliopisto
author_facet Alaranta, Sanna Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta Faculty of Social Sciences Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylän yliopisto Alaranta, Sanna Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta Faculty of Social Sciences Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylän yliopisto
author_sort Alaranta, Sanna
datasource_str_mv jyx
description Tutkimuksen tehtävänä on selvittää BONUS- Itämeren tutkimusrahoitusohjelman sidosryhmäsuhteita. Tutkimus on toteutettu ajankohtana kesä 2010 – syksy 2011, ja se sijoittui BONUS- ohjelman strategiseen vaiheeseen, jonka aikana rakennettiin strategista tutkimusohjelma ja vahvistettiin sidosryhmäsuhteita. Tutkimuksessa on kaksi aineistoa: Tutkielman ensimmäinen empiirinen osa muodostuu BONUS sihteeristön sidosryhmänäkemyksestä ja toinen aineisto on kerätty avoimen kyselyn avulla (written questioning) Itämeren alueella toimivissa erilaisissa verkostoissa. Tutkimuksen keskiössä on ollut selvittää, miten BONUS organisaatio voisi parantaa sidosryhmäsuhteitaan ja laajentaa vaikuttavuuttaan perinteisen tiedeyhteisön ulkopuolelle. Yhteiskunnallinen kiinnostuvuus tutkimuksessa onkin tieteen ja muun yhteiskunnan väliset suhteet ja vuorovaikutus. Teoreettinen pohja ja päänäkökulma tutkimuksessa on Bruno Latourin ajatukset tieteestä kollektiivisena projektina sekä hänen ideansa ei-humaanista toimijuudesta. Käytännön tutkimustyövälineenä on Mitchell, Agle ja Woodin (1997) sidosryhmätypologia, jonka kautta sidosryhmiä on pystytty kategorisoimaan ja tarkastelemaan. Analyysimenetelmänä tutkimuksessa on käytetty laadullista sisällönanalyysia, jonka temaattisena rungona on toiminut em. sidosryhmätypologia sekä Luoma-Ahon ja Paloviidan (2010) malli erilaisista ei-humaaneista toimija-alueista, joiden kautta voidaan tulkita uusia sidosryhmiä organisaatiolle. Tutkimustulokset osoittavat, että vaikka tutkimusyhteisön näkökulmasta tärkeimmät sidosryhmät löytyvät pääosin itse tiedeyhteisöstä, rahoitusorganisaatioista ja päättäviltä tahoilta, uusin tieto ja tutkimustulokset kiinnostavat myös laajempaa yhteiskuntaa. BONUS- ohjelmalle löytyi seitsemän uutta toimija-aluetta (yhteistyö, uudet aloitteet ja hankkeet, sosiaalinen ulottuvuus, talous- ja teollisuus, inhimillinen pääoma, Itämeren alue mallialueena ja mielipiteen muokkaaminen), joiden kautta organisaatio voi löytää uusia kanavia ja sidosryhmiä yhteiskuntaan. Tiedeorganisaatioiden tulisikin kiinnittää suurempaa huomiota niihin toimija-alueisiin, joiden kautta tieteen tulokset voisivat saavuttaa yhteiskunnan eri alueet ja näin Latourin ajatusten mukaisesti puolustaa myös omaa asemaansa yhteiskunnassa. The main aim in the research is to analyse the stakeholder relations of BONUS Joint Research and Development Programme. The research has been executed during summer 2010 – autumn 2011 and it is part of the strategic phase of the BONUS Programme, during which the Strategic Research Agenda and the stakeholder relations were built. The research has two empirical datas: The first data consists of the management view of BONUS Secretariat and the second part of data was gathered via written questionings sent to various Baltic Sea Networks. The focus of the research has been to study how BONUS could develop and widen its stakeholder relations and promote the Programme and its product, new knowledge, beyond the science community and traditional stakeholder understanding. The social and public policy interest in this research is in the interface of science and society and the relations between them. The main theoretical view point are the ideas of Bruno Latour on “Science as a collective project” and the non-human actorship. The stakeholder typology by Mitchell, Agle and Wood (1997) has acted as the practical tool to categorise and analyse the stakeholdergroups. The method for analysis is qualitative content analysis, applying the tools given by the stakeholder typology as well as the model of spheres of influence by Luoma-aho and Paloviita (2010). The research results indicate that while – from the management point of view – the most important stakeholder groups are found within the science community, policy sector as well as funding organisations, the wider society has a need for new knowledge and science results, as well. This study reveals seven new spheres of influence where new channels of dissemination and new stakeholders can be translated from: cooperation, new initiatives and projects, social dimension, economy and industry, human capital, Baltic Sea Region as a model, opinion forming). The scientific community should pay more attention also to those spheres of influence, through which the different sectors of the society could be reached in a focused manner and thus reinforce the status of science by making it a collective project.
first_indexed 2023-03-22T09:59:15Z
format Pro gradu
fullrecord [{"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Alaranta, Sanna", "language": null, "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2012-10-24T07:07:11Z", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2012-10-24T07:07:11Z", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2011", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.other", "value": "oai:jykdok.linneanet.fi:1233109", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/40075", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Tutkimuksen teht\u00e4v\u00e4n\u00e4 on selvitt\u00e4\u00e4 BONUS- It\u00e4meren tutkimusrahoitusohjelman sidosryhm\u00e4suhteita. Tutkimus on toteutettu ajankohtana kes\u00e4 2010 \u2013 syksy 2011, ja se sijoittui BONUS- ohjelman strategiseen vaiheeseen, jonka aikana rakennettiin strategista tutkimusohjelma ja vahvistettiin sidosryhm\u00e4suhteita. Tutkimuksessa on kaksi aineistoa: Tutkielman ensimm\u00e4inen empiirinen osa muodostuu BONUS sihteerist\u00f6n sidosryhm\u00e4n\u00e4kemyksest\u00e4 ja toinen aineisto on ker\u00e4tty avoimen kyselyn avulla (written questioning) It\u00e4meren alueella toimivissa erilaisissa verkostoissa.\r\nTutkimuksen keski\u00f6ss\u00e4 on ollut selvitt\u00e4\u00e4, miten BONUS organisaatio voisi parantaa sidosryhm\u00e4suhteitaan ja laajentaa vaikuttavuuttaan perinteisen tiedeyhteis\u00f6n ulkopuolelle. Yhteiskunnallinen kiinnostuvuus tutkimuksessa onkin tieteen ja muun yhteiskunnan v\u00e4liset suhteet ja vuorovaikutus. Teoreettinen pohja ja p\u00e4\u00e4n\u00e4k\u00f6kulma tutkimuksessa on Bruno Latourin ajatukset tieteest\u00e4 kollektiivisena projektina sek\u00e4 h\u00e4nen ideansa ei-humaanista toimijuudesta.\r\nK\u00e4yt\u00e4nn\u00f6n tutkimusty\u00f6v\u00e4lineen\u00e4 on Mitchell, Agle ja Woodin (1997) sidosryhm\u00e4typologia, jonka kautta sidosryhmi\u00e4 on pystytty kategorisoimaan ja tarkastelemaan. Analyysimenetelm\u00e4n\u00e4 tutkimuksessa on k\u00e4ytetty laadullista sis\u00e4ll\u00f6nanalyysia, jonka temaattisena rungona on toiminut em. sidosryhm\u00e4typologia sek\u00e4 Luoma-Ahon ja Paloviidan (2010) malli erilaisista ei-humaaneista toimija-alueista, joiden kautta voidaan tulkita uusia sidosryhmi\u00e4 organisaatiolle.\r\nTutkimustulokset osoittavat, ett\u00e4 vaikka tutkimusyhteis\u00f6n n\u00e4k\u00f6kulmasta t\u00e4rkeimm\u00e4t sidosryhm\u00e4t l\u00f6ytyv\u00e4t p\u00e4\u00e4osin itse tiedeyhteis\u00f6st\u00e4, rahoitusorganisaatioista ja p\u00e4\u00e4tt\u00e4vilt\u00e4 tahoilta, uusin tieto ja tutkimustulokset kiinnostavat my\u00f6s laajempaa yhteiskuntaa. BONUS- ohjelmalle l\u00f6ytyi seitsem\u00e4n uutta toimija-aluetta (yhteisty\u00f6, uudet aloitteet ja hankkeet, sosiaalinen ulottuvuus, talous- ja teollisuus, inhimillinen p\u00e4\u00e4oma, It\u00e4meren alue mallialueena ja mielipiteen muokkaaminen), joiden kautta organisaatio voi l\u00f6yt\u00e4\u00e4 uusia kanavia ja sidosryhmi\u00e4 yhteiskuntaan. Tiedeorganisaatioiden tulisikin kiinnitt\u00e4\u00e4 suurempaa huomiota niihin toimija-alueisiin, joiden kautta tieteen tulokset voisivat saavuttaa yhteiskunnan eri alueet ja n\u00e4in Latourin ajatusten mukaisesti puolustaa my\u00f6s omaa asemaansa yhteiskunnassa.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "The main aim in the research is to analyse the stakeholder relations of BONUS Joint Research and Development Programme. The research has been executed during summer 2010 \u2013 autumn 2011 and it is part of the strategic phase of the BONUS Programme, during which the Strategic Research Agenda and the stakeholder relations were built. The research has two empirical datas: The first data consists of the management view of BONUS Secretariat and the second part of data was gathered via written questionings sent to various Baltic Sea Networks.\r\nThe focus of the research has been to study how BONUS could develop and widen its stakeholder relations and promote the Programme and its product, new knowledge, beyond the science community and traditional stakeholder understanding. The social and public policy interest in this research is in the interface of science and society and the relations between them. The main theoretical view point are the ideas of Bruno Latour on \u201cScience as a collective project\u201d and the non-human actorship.\r\nThe stakeholder typology by Mitchell, Agle and Wood (1997) has acted as the practical tool to categorise and analyse the stakeholdergroups. The method for analysis is qualitative content analysis, applying the tools given by the stakeholder typology as well as the model of spheres of influence by Luoma-aho and Paloviita (2010).\r\nThe research results indicate that while \u2013 from the management point of view \u2013 the most important stakeholder groups are found within the science community, policy sector as well as funding organisations, the wider society has a need for new knowledge and science results, as well. This study reveals seven new spheres of influence where new channels of dissemination and new stakeholders can be translated from: cooperation, new initiatives and projects, social dimension, economy and industry, human capital, Baltic Sea Region as a model, opinion forming). The scientific community should pay more attention also to those spheres of influence, through which the different sectors of the society could be reached in a focused manner and thus reinforce the status of science by making it a collective project.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted using Plone Publishing form by Hilla M\u00e4kel\u00e4 (himiirma) on 2012-10-24 07:07:10.961192. Form: Admin-lomake Pro gradu -t\u00f6ille (https://kirjasto.jyu.fi/julkaisut/julkaisulomakkeet/admin-lomake-pro-gradu-toille). JyX data:", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by jyx lomake-julkaisija (jyx-julkaisija@noreply.fi) on 2012-10-24T07:07:11Z\r\nNo. of bitstreams: 2\r\nURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201210242771.pdf: 1246670 bytes, checksum: 45df8a9c3174bd554c34bb3ba5335953 (MD5)\r\nlicense.html: 107 bytes, checksum: a7d86e598caa500b1b433bbb9dc8ef1c (MD5)", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2012-10-24T07:07:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2\r\nURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201210242771.pdf: 1246670 bytes, checksum: 45df8a9c3174bd554c34bb3ba5335953 (MD5)\r\nlicense.html: 107 bytes, checksum: a7d86e598caa500b1b433bbb9dc8ef1c (MD5)\r\n Previous issue date: 2011", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "94 sivua", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "sidosryhm\u00e4analyysi", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "tutkimuspolitiikka", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "toimijaverkkoteoria", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "It\u00e4meri", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "alueellinen yhteisty\u00f6", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "tutkimusrahoitus", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Stakeholder relations in macro-regional science cooperation : case study : Stakeholder analysis for BONUS joint research and development programme", "language": null, "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title.alternative", "value": "Case study : Stakeholder analysis for BONUS joint research and development programme", "language": null, "element": "title", "qualifier": "alternative", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201210242771", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.dcmitype", "value": "Text", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "dcmitype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Social Sciences", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Yhteiskuntapolitiikka", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Social Policy", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.method", "value": "Sis\u00e4ll\u00f6nanalyysi", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "method", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.updated", "value": "2012-10-24T07:07:11Z", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "updated", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "restrictedAccess", "language": "fi", "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "209", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "sidosryhm\u00e4t", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "tutkimuspolitiikka", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "toimijaverkkoteoria", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "alueellinen yhteisty\u00f6", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "tutkimusrahoitus", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "It\u00e4meri", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accessrights", "value": "Aineistoon p\u00e4\u00e4sy\u00e4 on rajoitettu tekij\u00e4noikeussyist\u00e4. Aineisto on luettavissa Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopiston kirjaston arkistoty\u00f6asemalta. Ks. https://kirjasto.jyu.fi/fi/tyoskentelytilat/laitteet-ja-tilat.", "language": "fi", "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accessrights", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accessrights", "value": "This material has a restricted access due to copyright reasons. It can be read at the workstation at Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4 University Library reserved for the use of archival materials: https://kirjasto.jyu.fi/en/workspaces/facilities.", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accessrights", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.okm", "value": "G2", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "okm", "schema": "dc"}]
id jyx.123456789_40075
language eng
last_indexed 2025-03-31T20:02:03Z
main_date 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
main_date_str 2011
publishDate 2011
record_format qdc
source_str_mv jyx
spellingShingle Alaranta, Sanna Stakeholder relations in macro-regional science cooperation : case study : Stakeholder analysis for BONUS joint research and development programme sidosryhmäanalyysi tutkimuspolitiikka toimijaverkkoteoria Itämeri alueellinen yhteistyö tutkimusrahoitus Yhteiskuntapolitiikka Social Policy Sisällönanalyysi 209 sidosryhmät
title Stakeholder relations in macro-regional science cooperation : case study : Stakeholder analysis for BONUS joint research and development programme
title_alt Case study : Stakeholder analysis for BONUS joint research and development programme
title_full Stakeholder relations in macro-regional science cooperation : case study : Stakeholder analysis for BONUS joint research and development programme
title_fullStr Stakeholder relations in macro-regional science cooperation : case study : Stakeholder analysis for BONUS joint research and development programme Stakeholder relations in macro-regional science cooperation : case study : Stakeholder analysis for BONUS joint research and development programme
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholder relations in macro-regional science cooperation : case study : Stakeholder analysis for BONUS joint research and development programme Stakeholder relations in macro-regional science cooperation : case study : Stakeholder analysis for BONUS joint research and development programme
title_short Stakeholder relations in macro-regional science cooperation
title_sort stakeholder relations in macro regional science cooperation case study stakeholder analysis for bonus joint research and development programme
title_sub case study
title_txtP Stakeholder relations in macro-regional science cooperation : case study : Stakeholder analysis for BONUS joint research and development programme
topic sidosryhmäanalyysi tutkimuspolitiikka toimijaverkkoteoria Itämeri alueellinen yhteistyö tutkimusrahoitus Yhteiskuntapolitiikka Social Policy Sisällönanalyysi 209 sidosryhmät
topic_facet 209 Itämeri Sisällönanalyysi Social Policy Yhteiskuntapolitiikka alueellinen yhteistyö sidosryhmäanalyysi sidosryhmät toimijaverkkoteoria tutkimuspolitiikka tutkimusrahoitus
url https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/40075 http://www.urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201210242771
work_keys_str_mv AT alarantasanna stakeholderrelationsinmacroregionalsciencecooperationcasestudystakeholderanalysisf