APA (7th ed.) Citation

Pantsar, R., tiedekunta, Y., Sciences, F. o. S., laitos, P., Psychology, D. o., Jyväskylä, U. o., & yliopisto, J. (2008). Two-step principal component analysis (PCA) as a method for separating auditory N1 and N250 elicited from 9-year-old children using a dense electrode array: Comparison between ERP-PCA and CSD-PCA.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Pantsar, Riikka, Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta, Faculty of Social Sciences, Psykologian laitos, Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, and Jyväskylän yliopisto. Two-step Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as a Method for Separating Auditory N1 and N250 Elicited from 9-year-old Children Using a Dense Electrode Array: Comparison Between ERP-PCA and CSD-PCA. 2008.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Pantsar, Riikka, et al. Two-step Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as a Method for Separating Auditory N1 and N250 Elicited from 9-year-old Children Using a Dense Electrode Array: Comparison Between ERP-PCA and CSD-PCA. 2008.