Impact of social aspects on public perceptions of energy security dimensions a case study of Jordan

Energy-security indices typically treat their component dimensions—Availability, Diversity, Cost, Technology & Efficiency, Location, Timeframe, Resilience, Environment, Health, Culture, Literacy, Employment, Policy, Military, and Cyber Security—as equally important. This assumption has rarely...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Azzuni, Abdelrahman
Other Authors: Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos, Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, Jyväskylän yliopisto, University of Jyväskylä
Format: Master's thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access: https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/103357
_version_ 1834856795475017728
author Azzuni, Abdelrahman
author2 Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_facet Azzuni, Abdelrahman Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä Azzuni, Abdelrahman Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_sort Azzuni, Abdelrahman
datasource_str_mv jyx
description Energy-security indices typically treat their component dimensions—Availability, Diversity, Cost, Technology & Efficiency, Location, Timeframe, Resilience, Environment, Health, Culture, Literacy, Employment, Policy, Military, and Cyber Security—as equally important. This assumption has rarely been validated against societal preferences. The present research tests it in Jordan, a net-importing nation seeking to diversify and decarbonise its energy mix, by asking: How do social aspects impact public perceptions of the relative importance of energy security dimensions? A structured questionnaire employing a five-point scale gathered 1,000 responses distributed proportion-ally across four income quartiles and six educational categories. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA were used to explore three sub-questions: (1) How do income groups differ in their perceptions of the importance of each energy security dimension? (2) How do education levels influence the perceived importance of energy security dimensions? (3) Do statistically significant differences in perception exist across social groups for any energy security dimensions? A structured questionnaire employing a five-point scale gathered 1 000 responses distributed proportion-ally across four income quartiles and six educational categories. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA were used to compare mean ratings within and between groups. Dimension weights were then normalised to percentage shares to create perception-based weighting profiles. Across the full sample the fifteen dimensions cluster tightly between 6.2 % and 7.2 % of total perceived importance, confirming broad support for a multidimensional approach. Nevertheless, Policy (6.9 %) and Technology & Efficiency (7.0 %) emerge as modest but consistent frontrunners, while Cost, Location and Cyber-security sit at the lower end of the range. Income differences are muted: low-income respondents accentuate short-term welfare dimensions (Avail-ability, Health), whereas high-income respondents give slightly greater weight to forward-looking Timeframe and Technology considerations. Educational attainment introduces more nuance: holders of diplomas and bachelor’s degrees rate Policy and Technology highest, postgraduate respondents elevate Resilience and Military, and those with limited schooling prioritise Environment and Employment. The equal-weighting convention remains a defensible baseline, yet micro-adjustments grounded in public perception can enhance the sensitivity and legitimacy of composite energy-security indices. For Jordan the findings translate into three actionable imperatives: strengthen institutional transparency, accelerate technological upgrades (especially digital grid management and renewables) and adopt integrative policies that acknowledge environmental, health and cultural co-benefits. Methodologically, the survey instrument offers a replicable template for other countries, enabling cross-national comparisons of the social elasticity of energy-security priorities. By reconciling normative index design with empirical social evidence, this thesis bridges a critical gap in energy-security scholarship and provides policymakers with a citizen-anchored compass for navigating the transition toward resilient, low-carbon energy systems.
first_indexed 2025-06-11T20:04:37Z
format Pro gradu
free_online_boolean 1
fullrecord [{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Juego, Bonn", "language": null, "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Azzuni, Abdelrahman", "language": null, "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2025-06-11T05:36:38Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2025-06-11T05:36:38Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2025", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/103357", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Energy-security indices typically treat their component dimensions\u2014Availability, Diversity, Cost, Technology & Efficiency, Location, Timeframe, Resilience, Environment, Health, Culture, Literacy, Employment, Policy, Military, and Cyber Security\u2014as equally important. This assumption has rarely been validated against societal preferences. The present research tests it in Jordan, a net-importing nation seeking to diversify and decarbonise its energy mix, by asking: How do social aspects impact public perceptions of the relative importance of energy security dimensions?\nA structured questionnaire employing a five-point scale gathered 1,000 responses distributed proportion-ally across four income quartiles and six educational categories. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA were used to explore three sub-questions: (1) How do income groups differ in their perceptions of the importance of each energy security dimension? (2) How do education levels influence the perceived importance of energy security dimensions? (3) Do statistically significant differences in perception exist across social groups for any energy security dimensions?\nA structured questionnaire employing a five-point scale gathered 1 000 responses distributed proportion-ally across four income quartiles and six educational categories. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA were used to compare mean ratings within and between groups. Dimension weights were then normalised to percentage shares to create perception-based weighting profiles.\nAcross the full sample the fifteen dimensions cluster tightly between 6.2 % and 7.2 % of total perceived importance, confirming broad support for a multidimensional approach. Nevertheless, Policy (6.9 %) and Technology & Efficiency (7.0 %) emerge as modest but consistent frontrunners, while Cost, Location and Cyber-security sit at the lower end of the range.\nIncome differences are muted: low-income respondents accentuate short-term welfare dimensions (Avail-ability, Health), whereas high-income respondents give slightly greater weight to forward-looking Timeframe and Technology considerations. Educational attainment introduces more nuance: holders of diplomas and bachelor\u2019s degrees rate Policy and Technology highest, postgraduate respondents elevate Resilience and Military, and those with limited schooling prioritise Environment and Employment.\nThe equal-weighting convention remains a defensible baseline, yet micro-adjustments grounded in public perception can enhance the sensitivity and legitimacy of composite energy-security indices. For Jordan the findings translate into three actionable imperatives: strengthen institutional transparency, accelerate technological upgrades (especially digital grid management and renewables) and adopt integrative policies that acknowledge environmental, health and cultural co-benefits. Methodologically, the survey instrument offers a replicable template for other countries, enabling cross-national comparisons of the social elasticity of energy-security priorities.\nBy reconciling normative index design with empirical social evidence, this thesis bridges a critical gap in energy-security scholarship and provides policymakers with a citizen-anchored compass for navigating the transition toward resilient, low-carbon energy systems.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Paivi Vuorio (paelvuor@jyu.fi) on 2025-06-11T05:36:38Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2025-06-11T05:36:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2025", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "122", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "multidimensional weighting", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "social perception", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "income and education impacts", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Jordan", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "policy & technology priorities", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "public survey", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Impact of social aspects on public perceptions of energy security dimensions : a case study of Jordan", "language": null, "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202506115157", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": null, "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": null, "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Kansainv\u00e4linen kehitysty\u00f6 (maisteriohjelma)", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Master's Degree Programme in Development and International Cooperation", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.copyright", "value": "\u00a9 The Author(s)", "language": "fi", "element": "rights", "qualifier": "copyright", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "energiapolitiikka", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "energiaturvallisuus", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}]
id jyx.123456789_103357
language eng
last_indexed 2025-06-11T20:04:37Z
main_date 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z
main_date_str 2025
online_boolean 1
online_urls_str_mv {"url":"https:\/\/jyx.jyu.fi\/bitstreams\/b2dee329-64a5-49d7-92d8-ac9ef17f6d27\/download","text":"URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202506115157.pdf","source":"jyx","mediaType":"application\/pdf"}
publishDate 2025
record_format qdc
source_str_mv jyx
spellingShingle Azzuni, Abdelrahman Impact of social aspects on public perceptions of energy security dimensions : a case study of Jordan multidimensional weighting social perception income and education impacts Jordan policy & technology priorities public survey Kansainvälinen kehitystyö (maisteriohjelma) Master's Degree Programme in Development and International Cooperation energiapolitiikka energiaturvallisuus
title Impact of social aspects on public perceptions of energy security dimensions : a case study of Jordan
title_full Impact of social aspects on public perceptions of energy security dimensions : a case study of Jordan
title_fullStr Impact of social aspects on public perceptions of energy security dimensions : a case study of Jordan Impact of social aspects on public perceptions of energy security dimensions : a case study of Jordan
title_full_unstemmed Impact of social aspects on public perceptions of energy security dimensions : a case study of Jordan Impact of social aspects on public perceptions of energy security dimensions : a case study of Jordan
title_short Impact of social aspects on public perceptions of energy security dimensions
title_sort impact of social aspects on public perceptions of energy security dimensions a case study of jordan
title_sub a case study of Jordan
title_txtP Impact of social aspects on public perceptions of energy security dimensions : a case study of Jordan
topic multidimensional weighting social perception income and education impacts Jordan policy & technology priorities public survey Kansainvälinen kehitystyö (maisteriohjelma) Master's Degree Programme in Development and International Cooperation energiapolitiikka energiaturvallisuus
topic_facet Jordan Kansainvälinen kehitystyö (maisteriohjelma) Master's Degree Programme in Development and International Cooperation energiapolitiikka energiaturvallisuus income and education impacts multidimensional weighting policy & technology priorities public survey social perception
url https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/103357 http://www.urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202506115157
work_keys_str_mv AT azzuniabdelrahman impactofsocialaspectsonpublicperceptionsofenergysecuritydimensionsacasestudyof