Working alongside Robotic Process Automation and emergence of technostress

Two phenomena are increasingly common: the increased use of technology in working life and the increase in sickness absences due to mental health problems and stress in the working age population. While the two could be linked only coincidentally, technostress is an existing burden for many people w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Haapanen, Kimmo
Other Authors: Faculty of Information Technology, Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylän yliopisto
Format: Master's thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access: https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/97806
_version_ 1826225728220299265
author Haapanen, Kimmo
author2 Faculty of Information Technology Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylän yliopisto
author_facet Haapanen, Kimmo Faculty of Information Technology Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylän yliopisto Haapanen, Kimmo Faculty of Information Technology Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylän yliopisto
author_sort Haapanen, Kimmo
datasource_str_mv jyx
description Two phenomena are increasingly common: the increased use of technology in working life and the increase in sickness absences due to mental health problems and stress in the working age population. While the two could be linked only coincidentally, technostress is an existing burden for many people who are in contact with technology in an occupational context. The ways of working and the continuity of work roles are under constant pressure of change. One force for change is the increased use of automation at organizations. One such area of automation is the use of Robotic Process Automation (RPA). RPA is set to promise an increase in efficiency and reduction in repetitive tasks at work. With RPA the desired effect is on the positive side, but at the same time knowledge about the negative side is light or non-existent in the academic literature. Technostress has many effects on workers in organizations which may lead to symptoms like emotional outbursts, negative moods and conflicts. This study aims to increase understanding of the human interaction with RPA as a technology, experiences of technostress and occupational stress at the workplace and how they interact with each other. The technology of RPA and the interaction between technostress and occupational stress are both understudied as of now. The data was gathered through qualitative interviews of 22 experts working alongside RPA either as end users or as technical stakeholders responsible for upkeep of the technology from multiple organizations and roles. The results suggest that technostress exists in the field of RPA as well, but it also interacts with occupational stress through workflow disruptions and performance hindrances, which increases the overall stress load of an individual. The use of technology also makes teams more susceptible to experience of stress through rustification of skills needed to conduct the automated tasks in cases of RPA malfunction, and also by making working days more intense. The RPA also causes different kinds of stress experience in different stages of the RPA lifecycle. Lastly RPA causes different kinds of stress experience depending on your viewpoint as an end user or as a technical person. These results provide novel understanding on how RPA causes a mix of technostress and occupational stress and how the maturity of the RPA and the viewpoint of the individual modify the stress experience. Keywords: technostress, occupational stress, Robotic Process Automation, organizational mitigation Kaksi ilmiötä yleistyvät samanaikaisesti: teknologian esiintyvyys työelämässä sekä mielenterveyshäiriöperusteiset poissaolot työikäisillä ihmisillä. Vaikka näiden kahden välinen yhteys voi olla sattumanvarainen, on teknostressi olemassa oleva kuormitustekijä monelle ihmiselle, jotka joutuvat tekemisiin teknologian kanssa työelämässä. Samanaikaisesti työnteon tavat ja työroolien jatkuvuus ovat muutoksessa. Yksi automaation muoto on ohjelmistorobotiikka (RPA). RPA:n hyödyntämisen uskotaan johtavan muun muassa tehokkuuden kasvuun ja toistuvien työtehtävien vähenemiseen, mutta muiden teknologioiden tapaan teknostressin riski on siinäkin olemassa. RPA:n käyttöönottoon liitetään toiveita positiivisista vaikutuksista, mutta samanaikaisesti tieto negatiivisista puolista on vähäistä tai olematonta akateemisessa kirjallisuudessa. Teknostressi vaikuttaa organisaation työntekijöihin monilla tavoilla kokonaiskuormituksen kasvamisen myötä, ja voi johtaa erilaisiin oireisiin, kuten tunteenpurkauksiin, negatiivisiin tunnetiloihin ja konflikteihin. Tämä tutkimus pyrkii lisäämään ymmärrystä ihmisten vuorovaikutuksesta RPA-teknologian kanssa, sen tuottamasta teknostressistä ja työperäisestä stressistä työpaikalla ja mainittujen stressityyppien välisestä vuorovaikutuksesta. RPA, sen aiheuttama stressi ja niiden välinen vuorovaikutus on vain vähän tutkittua. Aineisto kerättiin 22 laadullisen asiantuntijahaastattelun kautta. Kohderyhmänä haastatteluissa olivat loppukäyttäjät ja RPA-ohjelmistokehittäjät 11 eri organisaatiosta. Tulokset osoittavat teknostressin vaikuttavan myös RPA:n parissa työskenteleviin työntekijöihin, mutta samanaikaisesti aiheuttavan myös työperäistä stressiä työntekoa häiritsemällä, jotka vaikuttavat työntekijän kokemaan kokonaiskuormittumiseen. Teknologian käyttö myös altistaa työntekijöitä tuleville stressikokemuksille taitojen ruostumisen kautta, kun ajan saatossa automatisoidun työtehtävän suorittamisen taito hiipuu, jotka kuitenkin tulee suorittaa RPA:n häiriötilanteissa. RPA aiheuttaa myös erilaista stressiä eri RPA:n elämänkaaren vaiheissa. RPA aiheuttaa myös erilaista stressiä roolin mukaan: loppukäyttäjä ja ohjelmistokehittäjä stressaantuvat eri tavoin. Nämä tulokset lisäävät ymmärrystä RPA:n aiheuttamasta teknostressin ja työperäisen stressin sekoituksesta, niiden välisestä vuorovaikutuksesta ja RPA:n kypsyysasteen sekä roolinäkökulman vaikutuksista stressikokemukseen. Asiasanat: teknostressi, työperäinen stressi, ohjelmistorobotiikka, organisaation mitigaatiokeinot
first_indexed 2024-10-29T21:00:27Z
format Pro gradu
free_online_boolean 1
fullrecord [{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Salo, Markus", "language": null, "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Haapanen, Kimmo", "language": null, "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2024-10-29T08:28:54Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2024-10-29T08:28:54Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2024", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/97806", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Two phenomena are increasingly common: the increased use of technology in working life and the increase in sickness absences due to mental health problems and stress in the working age population. While the two could be linked only coincidentally, technostress is an existing burden for many people who are in contact with technology in an occupational context. The ways of working and the continuity of work roles are under constant pressure of change. One force for change is the increased use of automation at organizations. One such area of automation is the use of Robotic Process Automation (RPA). RPA is set to promise an increase in efficiency and reduction in repetitive tasks at work. With RPA the desired effect is on the positive side, but at the same time knowledge about the negative side is light or non-existent in the academic literature. Technostress has many effects on workers in organizations which may lead to symptoms like emotional outbursts, negative moods and conflicts. This study aims to increase understanding of the human interaction with RPA as a technology, experiences of technostress and occupational stress at the workplace and how they interact with each other. The technology of RPA and the interaction between technostress and occupational stress are both understudied as of now. The data was gathered through qualitative interviews of 22 experts working alongside RPA either as end users or as technical stakeholders responsible for upkeep of the technology from multiple organizations and roles. The results suggest that technostress exists in the field of RPA as well, but it also interacts with occupational stress through workflow disruptions and performance hindrances, which increases the overall stress load of an individual. The use of technology also makes teams more susceptible to experience of stress through rustification of skills needed to conduct the automated tasks in cases of RPA malfunction, and also by making working days more intense. The RPA also causes different kinds of stress experience in different stages of the RPA lifecycle. Lastly RPA causes different kinds of stress experience depending on your viewpoint as an end user or as a technical person. These results provide novel understanding on how RPA causes a mix of technostress and occupational stress and how the maturity of the RPA and the viewpoint of the individual modify the stress experience. \n\nKeywords: technostress, occupational stress, Robotic Process Automation, organizational mitigation", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Kaksi ilmi\u00f6t\u00e4 yleistyv\u00e4t samanaikaisesti: teknologian esiintyvyys ty\u00f6el\u00e4m\u00e4ss\u00e4 sek\u00e4 mielenterveysh\u00e4iri\u00f6perusteiset poissaolot ty\u00f6ik\u00e4isill\u00e4 ihmisill\u00e4. Vaikka n\u00e4iden kahden v\u00e4linen yhteys voi olla sattumanvarainen, on teknostressi olemassa oleva kuormitustekij\u00e4 monelle ihmiselle, jotka joutuvat tekemisiin teknologian kanssa ty\u00f6el\u00e4m\u00e4ss\u00e4. Samanaikaisesti ty\u00f6nteon tavat ja ty\u00f6roolien jatkuvuus ovat muutoksessa. Yksi automaation muoto on ohjelmistorobotiikka (RPA). RPA:n hy\u00f6dynt\u00e4misen uskotaan johtavan muun muassa tehokkuuden kasvuun ja toistuvien ty\u00f6teht\u00e4vien v\u00e4henemiseen, mutta muiden teknologioiden tapaan teknostressin riski on siin\u00e4kin olemassa. RPA:n k\u00e4ytt\u00f6\u00f6nottoon liitet\u00e4\u00e4n toiveita positiivisista vaikutuksista, mutta samanaikaisesti tieto negatiivisista puolista on v\u00e4h\u00e4ist\u00e4 tai olematonta akateemisessa kirjallisuudessa. Teknostressi vaikuttaa organisaation ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6ihin monilla tavoilla kokonaiskuormituksen kasvamisen my\u00f6t\u00e4, ja voi johtaa erilaisiin oireisiin, kuten tunteenpurkauksiin, negatiivisiin tunnetiloihin ja konflikteihin. T\u00e4m\u00e4 tutkimus pyrkii lis\u00e4\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4n ymm\u00e4rryst\u00e4 ihmisten vuorovaikutuksesta RPA-teknologian kanssa, sen tuottamasta teknostressist\u00e4 ja ty\u00f6per\u00e4isest\u00e4 stressist\u00e4 ty\u00f6paikalla ja mainittujen stressityyppien v\u00e4lisest\u00e4 vuorovaikutuksesta. RPA, sen aiheuttama stressi ja niiden v\u00e4linen vuorovaikutus on vain v\u00e4h\u00e4n tutkittua. Aineisto ker\u00e4ttiin 22 laadullisen asiantuntijahaastattelun kautta. Kohderyhm\u00e4n\u00e4 haastatteluissa olivat loppuk\u00e4ytt\u00e4j\u00e4t ja RPA-ohjelmistokehitt\u00e4j\u00e4t 11 eri organisaatiosta. Tulokset osoittavat teknostressin vaikuttavan my\u00f6s RPA:n parissa ty\u00f6skenteleviin ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6ihin, mutta samanaikaisesti aiheuttavan my\u00f6s ty\u00f6per\u00e4ist\u00e4 stressi\u00e4 ty\u00f6ntekoa h\u00e4iritsem\u00e4ll\u00e4, jotka vaikuttavat ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n kokemaan kokonaiskuormittumiseen. Teknologian k\u00e4ytt\u00f6 my\u00f6s altistaa ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6it\u00e4 tuleville stressikokemuksille taitojen ruostumisen kautta, kun ajan saatossa automatisoidun ty\u00f6teht\u00e4v\u00e4n suorittamisen taito hiipuu, jotka kuitenkin tulee suorittaa RPA:n h\u00e4iri\u00f6tilanteissa. RPA aiheuttaa my\u00f6s erilaista stressi\u00e4 eri RPA:n el\u00e4m\u00e4nkaaren vaiheissa. RPA aiheuttaa my\u00f6s erilaista stressi\u00e4 roolin mukaan: loppuk\u00e4ytt\u00e4j\u00e4 ja ohjelmistokehitt\u00e4j\u00e4 stressaantuvat eri tavoin. N\u00e4m\u00e4 tulokset lis\u00e4\u00e4v\u00e4t ymm\u00e4rryst\u00e4 RPA:n aiheuttamasta teknostressin ja ty\u00f6per\u00e4isen stressin sekoituksesta, niiden v\u00e4lisest\u00e4 vuorovaikutuksesta ja RPA:n kypsyysasteen sek\u00e4 roolin\u00e4k\u00f6kulman vaikutuksista stressikokemukseen. \n\nAsiasanat: teknostressi, ty\u00f6per\u00e4inen stressi, ohjelmistorobotiikka, organisaation mitigaatiokeinot", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by jyx lomake-julkaisija (jyx-julkaisija.group@korppi.jyu.fi) on 2024-10-29T08:28:54Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2024-10-29T08:28:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "71", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "CC BY 4.0", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Working alongside Robotic Process Automation and emergence of technostress", "language": null, "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202410296659", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Information Technology", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Tietoj\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4tieteen maisteriohjelma", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Master's Degree Programme in Information Systems", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.copyright", "value": "\u00a9 The Author(s)", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "copyright", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}]
id jyx.123456789_97806
language eng
last_indexed 2025-02-18T10:55:25Z
main_date 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
main_date_str 2024
online_boolean 1
online_urls_str_mv {"url":"https:\/\/jyx.jyu.fi\/bitstreams\/d7da9cd0-4cd4-4ced-a7e5-a5c1fa626cf6\/download","text":"URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202410296659.pdf","source":"jyx","mediaType":"application\/pdf"}
publishDate 2024
record_format qdc
source_str_mv jyx
spellingShingle Haapanen, Kimmo Working alongside Robotic Process Automation and emergence of technostress Tietojärjestelmätieteen maisteriohjelma Master's Degree Programme in Information Systems
title Working alongside Robotic Process Automation and emergence of technostress
title_full Working alongside Robotic Process Automation and emergence of technostress
title_fullStr Working alongside Robotic Process Automation and emergence of technostress Working alongside Robotic Process Automation and emergence of technostress
title_full_unstemmed Working alongside Robotic Process Automation and emergence of technostress Working alongside Robotic Process Automation and emergence of technostress
title_short Working alongside Robotic Process Automation and emergence of technostress
title_sort working alongside robotic process automation and emergence of technostress
title_txtP Working alongside Robotic Process Automation and emergence of technostress
topic Tietojärjestelmätieteen maisteriohjelma Master's Degree Programme in Information Systems
topic_facet Master's Degree Programme in Information Systems Tietojärjestelmätieteen maisteriohjelma
url https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/97806 http://www.urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202410296659
work_keys_str_mv AT haapanenkimmo workingalongsideroboticprocessautomationandemergenceoftechnostress