Life cycle costing (LCC) comparison between conventional and new type of composite doctor blade

Since the paper industry is an energy-intensive and using lots of all kinds of raw mate- rials for the production, the need for more sustainable products in the paper industry is increasing and highly appreciated. In this thesis one of the commodity products used in the paper machine, doctor blad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laitiainen, Timo
Other Authors: Kauppakorkeakoulu, School of Business and Economics, Taloustieteet, Business and Economics, Jyväskylän yliopisto, University of Jyväskylä
Format: Master's thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access: https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/96582
_version_ 1826225742442135552
author Laitiainen, Timo
author2 Kauppakorkeakoulu School of Business and Economics Taloustieteet Business and Economics Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_facet Laitiainen, Timo Kauppakorkeakoulu School of Business and Economics Taloustieteet Business and Economics Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä Laitiainen, Timo Kauppakorkeakoulu School of Business and Economics Taloustieteet Business and Economics Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_sort Laitiainen, Timo
datasource_str_mv jyx
description Since the paper industry is an energy-intensive and using lots of all kinds of raw mate- rials for the production, the need for more sustainable products in the paper industry is increasing and highly appreciated. In this thesis one of the commodity products used in the paper machine, doctor blades were studied. Two different kinds of doctor blades, conventional and a new type of composite blade Royal R1 100, were selected. The purpose of this thesis was to compare and evaluate these doctor blades from a life cycle perspective and to find out the most cost-efficient and more environmentally friendly product. The Life cycle costing (LCC) analysis is a method, which summarizes all the costs asso- ciated with the life cycle of the product and was chosen for this comparison. The analysis was done for both of the doctor blades, where life cycle inventory was di- vided into four different phases: production, transportation, use and end of use. The results of this LCC analysis showed, that one of the four phases played a key role. The use phase was for both of the doctor blades biggest factor and the outcome was very similar to the other LCC analysis done before. As a total result of this analysis, new type of doctor blade, Royal R1 100 is the preferable type of the doctor blade being more cost efficient and environmentally friendly product.
first_indexed 2024-08-12T20:00:49Z
format Pro gradu
free_online_boolean 1
fullrecord [{"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Laitiainen, Timo", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2024-08-12T11:20:44Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2024-08-12T11:20:44Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2016", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/96582", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Since the paper industry is an energy-intensive and using lots of all kinds of raw mate-\nrials for the production, the need for more sustainable products in the paper industry is \nincreasing and highly appreciated. \nIn this thesis one of the commodity products used in the paper machine, doctor blades \nwere studied. Two different kinds of doctor blades, conventional and a new type of \ncomposite blade Royal R1 100, were selected. The purpose of this thesis was to compare \nand evaluate these doctor blades from a life cycle perspective and to find out the most \ncost-efficient and more environmentally friendly product. \nThe Life cycle costing (LCC) analysis is a method, which summarizes all the costs asso-\nciated with the life cycle of the product and was chosen for this comparison. \nThe analysis was done for both of the doctor blades, where life cycle inventory was di-\nvided into four different phases: production, transportation, use and end of use. \nThe results of this LCC analysis showed, that one of the four phases played a key role. \nThe use phase was for both of the doctor blades biggest factor and the outcome was very \nsimilar to the other LCC analysis done before. As a total result of this analysis, new type \nof doctor blade, Royal R1 100 is the preferable type of the doctor blade being more cost \nefficient and environmentally friendly product.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Miia Hakanen (mihakane@jyu.fi) on 2024-08-12T11:20:44Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-12T11:20:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2016", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "48", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "life cycle costing", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "LCC analysis", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "doctor blade", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Life cycle costing (LCC) comparison between conventional and new type of composite doctor blade", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202408125458", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4 University School of Business and Economics", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopiston kauppakorkeakoulu", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Taloustieteet", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Business and Economics", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Yritysten ymp\u00e4rist\u00f6johtaminen", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Corporate Environmental Management", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "20425", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "komposiitit", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "elinkaariarviointi", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "elinkaari", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "kustannukset", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "paperiteollisuus", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "composites", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "life cycle analysis", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "product life cycle", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "costs", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "paper industry", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}]
id jyx.123456789_96582
language eng
last_indexed 2025-02-18T10:54:18Z
main_date 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
main_date_str 2016
online_boolean 1
online_urls_str_mv {"url":"https:\/\/jyx.jyu.fi\/bitstreams\/4e5a820d-d19b-4aa3-a6b6-40cb53ba0c3e\/download","text":"URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202408125458.pdf","source":"jyx","mediaType":"application\/pdf"}
publishDate 2016
record_format qdc
source_str_mv jyx
spellingShingle Laitiainen, Timo Life cycle costing (LCC) comparison between conventional and new type of composite doctor blade life cycle costing LCC analysis doctor blade Yritysten ympäristöjohtaminen Corporate Environmental Management 20425 komposiitit elinkaariarviointi elinkaari kustannukset paperiteollisuus composites life cycle analysis product life cycle costs paper industry
title Life cycle costing (LCC) comparison between conventional and new type of composite doctor blade
title_full Life cycle costing (LCC) comparison between conventional and new type of composite doctor blade
title_fullStr Life cycle costing (LCC) comparison between conventional and new type of composite doctor blade Life cycle costing (LCC) comparison between conventional and new type of composite doctor blade
title_full_unstemmed Life cycle costing (LCC) comparison between conventional and new type of composite doctor blade Life cycle costing (LCC) comparison between conventional and new type of composite doctor blade
title_short Life cycle costing (LCC) comparison between conventional and new type of composite doctor blade
title_sort life cycle costing lcc comparison between conventional and new type of composite doctor blade
title_txtP Life cycle costing (LCC) comparison between conventional and new type of composite doctor blade
topic life cycle costing LCC analysis doctor blade Yritysten ympäristöjohtaminen Corporate Environmental Management 20425 komposiitit elinkaariarviointi elinkaari kustannukset paperiteollisuus composites life cycle analysis product life cycle costs paper industry
topic_facet 20425 Corporate Environmental Management LCC analysis Yritysten ympäristöjohtaminen composites costs doctor blade elinkaari elinkaariarviointi komposiitit kustannukset life cycle analysis life cycle costing paper industry paperiteollisuus product life cycle
url https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/96582 http://www.urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202408125458
work_keys_str_mv AT laitiainentimo lifecyclecostinglcccomparisonbetweenconventionalandnewtypeofcompositedoctorblade