| fullrecord |
[{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Moilanen, Panu", "language": null, "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Maunu, Miikka Olavi", "language": null, "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2024-06-05T11:24:57Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2024-06-05T11:24:57Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2024", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/95546", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "This master\u2019s thesis examines Cambridge Analytica scandal and by using discourse analysis aims to find out how Helsingin Sanomat describes the scandal in its news articles and what kind of discourses emerges from those articles. The Cambridge Analytica scandal was disclosed in 2018 when leading news agencies around the world published news about it. In the center of the storm was a company called Cambridge Analytica which had collected and taken advantage of millions of users\u2019 personal data.\n\nThe literature review consists of four chapters. The first one concerns the scandal itself, proceeding with own chapters for the following topics: New technologies\u2019 influence on media environment, Information warfare and Online privacy. Each of these chapters gives a wider understanding of the phenomenon and supports in understanding the results of this study. The material for these chapters has been collected from different scientifical articles, books, and conference papers.\n\nIn total the material consisted of 96 news articles which were analyzed using discourse analysis as a method. As the results of the analysis, four main discourses were identified: user data exploitation, disregard, influencing and privacy.\n\nFirst of the discourses, user data exploitation, constructs reality that huge amount of user data can be gathered online without people knowing about that or without their acceptance. The second discourse, disregard, constructs reality in a way that Facebook is careless about its users\u2019 privacy and protecting their personal data. The third discourse, influencing, constructs reality in a way that services such as Facebook and its platform enables effective influencing on masses or on a targeted user. The fourth discourse, privacy, constructs reality in a way that privacy policies are hard to understand, and users are not aware how their data is handled and used.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "T\u00e4ss\u00e4 tutkielmassa tutkitaan Helsingin Sanomien uutisointia liittyen Cambridge Analytica -skandaaliin ja selvitet\u00e4\u00e4n diskurssianalyysin keinoin, millaisia diskursseja uutisartikkeleissa skandaalista on tunnistettavissa ja millaista todellisuutta ne rakentavat. Cambridge Analytica -skandaali tuli julki vuonna 2018, jolloin maailman johtavat uutismediat julkaisivat tietojaan, kuinka Cambridge Analytica niminen yritys oli ker\u00e4nnyt ja k\u00e4ytt\u00e4nyt hyv\u00e4ksi kymmenien miljoonien Facebook k\u00e4ytt\u00e4jien tietoja vaikuttaakseen muun muassa vuoden 2016 Yhdysvaltojen presidentinvaalien lopputulokseen.\n\nTutkielman kirjallisuuskatsauksessa on tarkasteltu itse skandaalia, teknologian vaikutusta mediamaiseman muuttumiseen, informaatiovaikuttamista sek\u00e4 yksityisyytt\u00e4 internetiss\u00e4. N\u00e4m\u00e4 luvut avaavat tarkemmin tutkimuksen tuloksina tunnistettuja diskursseja ilmi\u00f6in\u00e4. Kirjallisuuskatsausta varten tietoa on etsitty sek\u00e4 tieteellisist\u00e4 lehtiartikkeleista, alan kirjallisuudesta, ett\u00e4 konferenssijulkaisuista.\n\nDiskurssianalyysiss\u00e4 analysoitiin kaiken kaikkiaan 96 Helsingin Sanomien skandaaliin liittynytt\u00e4 uutisartikkelia. Analyysin perusteella tunnistettiin nelj\u00e4 p\u00e4\u00e4diskurssia, jotka ovat: k\u00e4ytt\u00e4j\u00e4tietojen hyv\u00e4ksik\u00e4yt\u00f6n diskurssi, piittaamattomuuden diskurssi, vaikuttamisen diskurssi ja yksityisyyden diskurssi.\n\nN\u00e4ist\u00e4 ensimm\u00e4inen eli k\u00e4ytt\u00e4j\u00e4tietojen hyv\u00e4ksik\u00e4yt\u00f6n diskurssi rakentaa kuvaa, kuinka k\u00e4ytt\u00e4jist\u00e4 voidaan verkossa ker\u00e4t\u00e4 valtavat m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4t tietoa ja k\u00e4ytt\u00e4\u00e4 sit\u00e4 hyv\u00e4ksi ilman heid\u00e4n tietoisuuttaa asiasta \u2013 tai kokonaan ilman heid\u00e4n hyv\u00e4ksynt\u00e4\u00e4ns\u00e4. Piittaamattomuuden diskurssi taas maalaa kuvaa siit\u00e4, kuinka piittaamattomasti Facebook on suojannut k\u00e4ytt\u00e4jiens\u00e4 tietoja ja toisaalta antanut v\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4lle tiedolle mahdollisuuden levit\u00e4 alustallaan. Vaikuttamisen diskurssi kuvaa sit\u00e4, kuinka Facebookin kaltaiset alustat ovat otollisia informaatiovaikuttamiselle, sill\u00e4 niiss\u00e4 viestint\u00e4\u00e4 voidaan kohdistaa suurille yleis\u00f6ille tai toisaalta kohdentaa viesti jopa suoraan yhdelle henkil\u00f6lle h\u00e4nen profilointinsa perusteella. Yksityisyyden diskurssi sen sijaan rakentaa kuvaa siit\u00e4, kuinka tietosuojapolitiikat ovat vaikeaselkoisia eiv\u00e4tk\u00e4 k\u00e4ytt\u00e4j\u00e4t v\u00e4ltt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00e4 ymm\u00e4rr\u00e4, mit\u00e4 heid\u00e4n yksityisill\u00e4 tiedoillansa tehd\u00e4\u00e4n tai kuinka niit\u00e4 k\u00e4sitell\u00e4\u00e4n.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by jyx lomake-julkaisija (jyx-julkaisija.group@korppi.jyu.fi) on 2024-06-05T11:24:57Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2024-06-05T11:24:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "55", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "fin", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Diskurssianalyysi Helsingin Sanomien Cambridge Analytica -skandaalin uutisoinnista", "language": null, "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202406054305", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Information Technology", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Information Systems Science", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Tietoj\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4tiede", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.copyright", "value": "\u00a9 The Author(s)", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "copyright", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "restrictedAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accessrights", "value": "The author has not given permission to make the work publicly available electronically. Therefore the material can be read only at the archival workstation at Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4 University Library (https://kirjasto.jyu.fi/en/workspaces/facilities/facilities#autotoc-item-autotoc-2).", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accessrights", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accessrights", "value": "Tekij\u00e4 ei ole antanut lupaa avoimeen julkaisuun, joten aineisto on luettavissa vain Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopiston kirjaston arkistoty\u00f6semalta. Ks. https://kirjasto.jyu.fi/fi/tyoskentelytilat/laitteet-ja-tilat#autotoc-item-autotoc-2.", "language": "fi", "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accessrights", "schema": "dc"}]
|