| fullrecord |
[{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Frank, Lauri", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Haapaniemi, Maiju", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2023-12-20T12:27:05Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2023-12-20T12:27:05Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2023", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/92435", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "T\u00e4ss\u00e4 tutkielmassa tarkasteltiin oikeusteknologioiden hyv\u00e4ksymist\u00e4 lakipalvelualalla. Lakipalvelualaa on perinteisesti pidetty liiketoimintamalleiltaan konservatiivisena ja muutosvastarintaisena. Alalla ollaan kuitenkin yh\u00e4 kiinnostuneempia innovatiivisten oikeusteknologioiden hy\u00f6dynt\u00e4misest\u00e4 liiketoiminnassa. T\u00e4m\u00e4 tutkimus vastaa tunnistettuun tutkimusaukkoon koskien teknologian hyv\u00e4ksymist\u00e4 yrityslakipalvelusektorilla Suomessa. Teoreettisessa osassa tarkasteltiin ensin oikeusteknologioiden k\u00e4sitett\u00e4 ja m\u00e4\u00e4ritelm\u00e4\u00e4. Tutkimus osoitti, ett\u00e4 kirjallisuudessa ei ole yksimielisyytt\u00e4 oikeusteknologian tarkasta m\u00e4\u00e4ritelm\u00e4st\u00e4. T\u00e4m\u00e4 k\u00e4sitys sai vahvistusta tutkimuksen empiirisess\u00e4 osassa. Teoreettisessa osassa esiteltiin my\u00f6s teknologian hyv\u00e4ksymisen keskeiset teoreettiset mallit ja aiempi tutkimus oikeusteknologioiden hyv\u00e4ksymisest\u00e4. Empiirinen osa koostui laadullisesta tapaustutkimuksesta, joka sis\u00e4lsi lakialan ammattilaisten haastatteluja. Haastatteluaineiston laadullisen analyysin tarkoituksena oli selvitt\u00e4\u00e4 lakialan ammattilaisten k\u00e4sityksi\u00e4 oikeusteknologian omaksumisesta. Empiirisen tutkimuksen pohjalta tunnistettiin 10 teemaa ja 39 alateemaa, joiden ehdotettiin seikkoina vaikuttavan oikeusteknologian hyv\u00e4ksymiseen lakialan ammattilaisten keskuudessa. T\u00e4m\u00e4 tutkimus t\u00e4ydent\u00e4\u00e4 olemassa olevaa tutkimusta teknologioiden hyv\u00e4ksymisest\u00e4 joukolla ehdotettuja uusia tekij\u00f6it\u00e4, jotka on ker\u00e4tty kontekstirikkaista haastattelumateriaalista spesifin asiantuntijapalvelualan n\u00e4k\u00f6kulmasta. Alan ammattilaisille t\u00e4m\u00e4 tutkimus tarjoaa arvokasta tietoa tekij\u00f6ist\u00e4, jotka on otettava huomioon otettaessa k\u00e4ytt\u00f6\u00f6n uusia oikeusteknologioita lakipalveluorganisaatioissa.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "This thesis examined the acceptance of legal technologies in the legal services industry. The legal services industry has been traditionally perceived as conservative in its business models and resistant to change. There is, however, a growing interest in utilizing innovative legal technologies in the legal services business. This research addressed a recognized research gap on the technology acceptance by legal professionals in the business-to-business legal service sector in Finland. The theoretical part first explored the concept and definition of legal technologies highlighting a lack of consensus in the literature regarding their precise definition. This understanding was later confirmed in the empirical part of the study. The theoretical part further introduced the key theoretical models of technology acceptance and analyzed prior studies on the acceptance of legal technologies. The empirical part consisted of a qualitative case study, including interviews with legal professionals. The qualitative analysis of the interview data aimed at understanding the legal professionals\u2019 perceptions on adoption of legal technologies. From the empirical study, 10 themes and 39 sub-themes were identified as factors proposed to affect legal technology acceptance by legal professionals. This study complements the existing research on acceptance of technologies with a set of proposed new acceptance factors gathered from context-rich interview data from a specific professional services perspective. For practitioners, this study provides valuable insights into factors to consider when integrating new legal technologies into legal service organizations.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Miia Hakanen (mihakane@jyu.fi) on 2023-12-20T12:27:05Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2023-12-20T12:27:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2023", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "99", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "legal tech", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "legal industry", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "technology acceptance", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "technology acceptance model", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "legal technology acceptance", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Acceptance of legal technologies among legal professionals", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202312208429", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Information Technology", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Informaatioteknologia", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Information Technology", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Tietoj\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4tiede", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Information Systems Science", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.collaborator", "value": "business", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "collaborator", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.initiative", "value": "student", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "initiative", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.copyright", "value": "\u00a9 The Author(s)", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "copyright", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "restrictedAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "601", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "lains\u00e4\u00e4d\u00e4nt\u00f6", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "teknologia", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "legislation", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "technology", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accessrights", "value": "The author has not given permission to make the work publicly available electronically. Therefore the material can be read only at the archival workstation at Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4 University Library (https://kirjasto.jyu.fi/collections/archival-workstation).", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accessrights", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accessrights", "value": "Tekij\u00e4 ei ole antanut lupaa avoimeen julkaisuun, joten aineisto on luettavissa vain Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopiston kirjaston arkistoty\u00f6semalta. Ks. https://kirjasto.jyu.fi/kokoelmat/arkistotyoasema..", "language": "fi", "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accessrights", "schema": "dc"}]
|