| fullrecord |
[{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Lamberg, Juha-Antti", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Sorsa, Virpi", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Jolkkonen, Kasimir", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2023-06-20T09:24:04Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2023-06-20T09:24:04Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2023", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/87960", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Globalisoitunut maailma on saanut organisaatiot kiinnitt\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4n yh\u00e4 enemm\u00e4n huomiota siihen, miten ulkopuoliset n\u00e4kev\u00e4t ne. T\u00e4m\u00e4 on johtanut legitimointi diskurssien lis\u00e4\u00e4ntymiseen yritysten legitimiteetin yll\u00e4pit\u00e4miseksi. \nT\u00e4m\u00e4n tutkimuksen tavoitteena on valottaa, miten keskeiset osapuolet, Fortum, Uniper ja Suomen hallituksen omistajaohjaus, yrittiv\u00e4t legitimoida tai delegitimoida yrityskaupan, ja tunnistaa keskeiset siihen k\u00e4ytetyt strategiat. Vuonna 2017 alkanut fuusio purkautui lopulta vuonna 2022. Purkautumisprosessi k\u00e4ynnistyi Ven\u00e4j\u00e4n ja Ukrainan sodan k\u00e4ynnistytty\u00e4, mik\u00e4 lopulta paljasti sek\u00e4 Fortumin ett\u00e4 Uniperin puolelta voimakkaan markkinariippuvuuden Ven\u00e4j\u00e4\u00e4n. \nTutkimuskysymykseen vastaamiseksi tutkittiin yritysraportteja, yritysten lehdist\u00f6tiedotteita, institutionaalista raporttia ja useita uutisl\u00e4hteit\u00e4 Suomesta ja ulkomailta. Tutkimuksessa hy\u00f6dynnettiin kriittist\u00e4 diskurssianalyysia keskeisten legitimaatiostrategioiden tunnistamiseksi. Tutkimus hy\u00f6dynsi johtavia diskurssilegitimointitutkimuksia ja niit\u00e4 sovellettiin tarvittaessa. \nTulokset osoittavat, ett\u00e4 legitimaatio- ja delegitimointistrategioita k\u00e4ytettiin samanaikaisesti. Fortum erottautui pit\u00e4ytym\u00e4ll\u00e4 legitimointistrategioihin koko prosessin ajan. N\u00e4it\u00e4 strategioita k\u00e4ytettiin fuusion perustelemiseksi ja legitiimiyden luomiseksi ja delegointistrategioita puolestaan sen kyseenalaistamiseksi. Keskeisi\u00e4 legitimointistrategioita olivat ajallisuuteen, valtuutukseen, rationalisointiin ja uusliberalistiseen liiketoimintaymp\u00e4rist\u00f6\u00f6n liittyv\u00e4t diskurssit. Delegitimointistrategioihin kuuluivat moraaliin vetoaminen sek\u00e4 syyt\u00f6sten ja kyseenalaistamisen v\u00e4lttely.\nTutkimus t\u00e4ydent\u00e4\u00e4 kirjallisuutta tarkastelemalla legitimoinnin monimutkaisuutta geopoliittisen kriisin, ideologisen strategisen muutoksen ja valtio-omistajan legitimointipyrkimysten yhteydess\u00e4.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Globalized world has caused organizations to pay evermore attention on how the observers and shareholders perceive them. This has led to an increase of legitimization discourses to maintain corporate legitimacy. This study aims to shed a light on how the key parties, Fortum, Uniper, and the Finnish Government, tried to legitimate or delegitimate the acquisition, and to identify the key strategies utilized. The acquisition process which started in 2017, faced its dissolution in 2022. This process started after the initiation of Russo-Ukrainian war, which ultimately exposed heavy market reliance from both Fortum and Uniper side. \nIn order to answer to the research question, corporate reports, corporate press releases, institutional report, and multiple news sources from Finland and abroad were examined. The study utilized critical discourse analysis in order to identify the key legitimation strategies. The study drew from the most well utilized discourse legitimation studies and complemented them in the pursuit of answering the research question.\nThe findings demonstrate that different legitimation and delegitimation strategies were used simultaneously. Fortum stood out by utilizing same legitimation strategies throughout the process. Legitimation strategies were used in order to justify and create a sense of legitimacy around the acquisition process and delegitimation strategies in order to challenge the legitimacy. Key legitimative strategies included time related discourses, authoritative discourses, rationalization in terms of strategy or neoliberal business environment. Delegitimative strategies included the appeal to morality and evasiveness in context of blame and questioning. \nThis study contributes to prior literature by examining complexities of legitimation in the context of geopolitical crisis, ideological strategic shift, and the state-owner\u2019s legitimation efforts.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Paivi Vuorio (paelvuor@jyu.fi) on 2023-06-20T09:24:04Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2023-06-20T09:24:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2023", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "60", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "legitimation", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "geopolitical crisis", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "state-ownership", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Unravelling the legitimation strategies in Fortum Uniper acquisition : insights into the roles of Fortum, Uniper, and the Finnish government", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202306204014", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4 University School of Business and Economics", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopiston kauppakorkeakoulu", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Taloustieteet", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Business and Economics", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Yritt\u00e4jyys", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Entrepreneurship", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.copyright", "value": "\u00a9 The Author(s)", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "copyright", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "20422", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "julkinen omistus", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "yritysstrategiat", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "hankinta", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "legitimiteetti", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "diskurssianalyysi", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "public ownership", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "corporate strategies", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "acquisition", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "legitimacy", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "discourse analysis", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}]
|