User requirements elicitation method comparison for a system upgrade

Tässä tutkielmassa kuvataan käyttäjävaatimusten keräämismenetelmiä kiinnittäen huomiota siihen, kuinka menetelmää voidaan hyödyntää olemassa olevan tietojärjestelmän ja sitä ympäröivien prosessien kehittämisen apuna. Tutkielmassa kuvatut 16 menetelmää jaettiin kuuteen luokkaan: perinteisiin, ryhmä-,...

Täydet tiedot

Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijä: Ylönen, Janna
Muut tekijät: Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta, Faculty of Information Technology, Informaatioteknologia, Information Technology, Jyväskylän yliopisto, University of Jyväskylä
Aineistotyyppi: Kandityö
Kieli:eng
Julkaistu: 2021
Aiheet:
Linkit: https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/77900
_version_ 1826225799994277888
author Ylönen, Janna
author2 Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta Faculty of Information Technology Informaatioteknologia Information Technology Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_facet Ylönen, Janna Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta Faculty of Information Technology Informaatioteknologia Information Technology Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä Ylönen, Janna Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta Faculty of Information Technology Informaatioteknologia Information Technology Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_sort Ylönen, Janna
datasource_str_mv jyx
description Tässä tutkielmassa kuvataan käyttäjävaatimusten keräämismenetelmiä kiinnittäen huomiota siihen, kuinka menetelmää voidaan hyödyntää olemassa olevan tietojärjestelmän ja sitä ympäröivien prosessien kehittämisen apuna. Tutkielmassa kuvatut 16 menetelmää jaettiin kuuteen luokkaan: perinteisiin, ryhmä-, prototyyppi-, kognitiivisiin ja kontekstuaalisiin menetelmiin. Tutkielma koostuu kirjallisuuskatsauksesta ja käyttäjävaatimusten keräämismenetelmiä vertailevasta taulukosta, johon on kerätty tiivistetysti kirjallisuuskatsauksessa esille tulleita kuvattujen menetelmien vahvuuksia ja heikkouksia. This thesis describes and evaluates methods for user requirements elicitation, paying particular attention to how they would fit to a case of upgrading an existing information management system and its processes. The 16 different user requirement elicitation methods were divided into six categories: traditional, group, prototyping, model-driven, cognitive, and contextual methods. This thesis consists of a literature review and a requirement elicitation method comparison table that summarises the pros and cons that have emerged in the literature review.
first_indexed 2024-09-11T08:50:12Z
format Kandityö
free_online_boolean 1
fullrecord [{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Sepp\u00e4nen, Ville", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Yl\u00f6nen, Janna", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2021-09-24T05:56:42Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2021-09-24T05:56:42Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2021", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/77900", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "T\u00e4ss\u00e4 tutkielmassa kuvataan k\u00e4ytt\u00e4j\u00e4vaatimusten ker\u00e4\u00e4mismenetelmi\u00e4 kiinnitt\u00e4en huomiota siihen, kuinka menetelm\u00e4\u00e4 voidaan hy\u00f6dynt\u00e4\u00e4 olemassa olevan tietoj\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4n ja sit\u00e4 ymp\u00e4r\u00f6ivien prosessien kehitt\u00e4misen apuna. Tutkielmassa kuvatut 16 menetelm\u00e4\u00e4 jaettiin kuuteen luokkaan: perinteisiin, ryhm\u00e4-, prototyyppi-, kognitiivisiin ja kontekstuaalisiin menetelmiin. Tutkielma koostuu kirjallisuuskatsauksesta ja k\u00e4ytt\u00e4j\u00e4vaatimusten ker\u00e4\u00e4mismenetelmi\u00e4 vertailevasta taulukosta, johon on ker\u00e4tty tiivistetysti kirjallisuuskatsauksessa esille tulleita kuvattujen menetelmien vahvuuksia ja heikkouksia.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "This thesis describes and evaluates methods for user requirements elicitation, paying particular attention to how they would fit to a case of upgrading an existing information management system and its processes. The 16 different user requirement elicitation methods were divided into six categories: traditional, group, prototyping, model-driven, cognitive, and contextual methods. This thesis consists of a literature review and a requirement elicitation method comparison table that summarises the pros and cons that have emerged in the literature review.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Paivi Vuorio (paelvuor@jyu.fi) on 2021-09-24T05:56:42Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2021-09-24T05:56:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2021", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "47", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "user requirements elicitation", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "elicitation methods", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "requirement process", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "technique selection", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "User requirements elicitation method comparison for a system upgrade", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "bachelor thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202109244971", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Bachelor's thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Kandidaatinty\u00f6", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Information Technology", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Informaatioteknologia", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Information Technology", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Tietoj\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4tiede", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Information Systems Science", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "bachelorThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "601", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "vaatimusm\u00e4\u00e4rittelyt", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "ohjelmistotuotanto", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "tutkimusmenetelm\u00e4t", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "menetelm\u00e4t", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "ohjelmistokehitys", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "requirement specifications", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "software engineering", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "research methods", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "methods", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "software development", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}]
id jyx.123456789_77900
language eng
last_indexed 2025-02-18T10:56:25Z
main_date 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
main_date_str 2021
online_boolean 1
online_urls_str_mv {"url":"https:\/\/jyx.jyu.fi\/bitstreams\/2326ca20-60bd-4426-8fc8-a73891024b74\/download","text":"URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202109244971.pdf","source":"jyx","mediaType":"application\/pdf"}
publishDate 2021
record_format qdc
source_str_mv jyx
spellingShingle Ylönen, Janna User requirements elicitation method comparison for a system upgrade user requirements elicitation elicitation methods requirement process technique selection Tietojärjestelmätiede Information Systems Science 601 vaatimusmäärittelyt ohjelmistotuotanto tutkimusmenetelmät menetelmät ohjelmistokehitys requirement specifications software engineering research methods methods software development
title User requirements elicitation method comparison for a system upgrade
title_full User requirements elicitation method comparison for a system upgrade
title_fullStr User requirements elicitation method comparison for a system upgrade User requirements elicitation method comparison for a system upgrade
title_full_unstemmed User requirements elicitation method comparison for a system upgrade User requirements elicitation method comparison for a system upgrade
title_short User requirements elicitation method comparison for a system upgrade
title_sort user requirements elicitation method comparison for a system upgrade
title_txtP User requirements elicitation method comparison for a system upgrade
topic user requirements elicitation elicitation methods requirement process technique selection Tietojärjestelmätiede Information Systems Science 601 vaatimusmäärittelyt ohjelmistotuotanto tutkimusmenetelmät menetelmät ohjelmistokehitys requirement specifications software engineering research methods methods software development
topic_facet 601 Information Systems Science Tietojärjestelmätiede elicitation methods menetelmät methods ohjelmistokehitys ohjelmistotuotanto requirement process requirement specifications research methods software development software engineering technique selection tutkimusmenetelmät user requirements elicitation vaatimusmäärittelyt
url https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/77900 http://www.urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202109244971
work_keys_str_mv AT ylönenjanna userrequirementselicitationmethodcomparisonforasystemupgrade