Forest discussion in Finland do we see beoynd the pine tree?

Tämä tutkimus käsittelee julkista metsäkeskustelua Maaseudun Tulevaisuuden sekä Helsingin sanomien mielipidekirjoituspalstoilla vuosien 2019 ja 2020 aikana. Tutki-muksen tarkoituksena on erottaa keskustelusta diskursseja, tunnistaa vallitseva hegemonia sekä tutkia diskurssien välisiä suhteita. Lisäk...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Koskinen, Jenna
Other Authors: Kauppakorkeakoulu, School of Business and Economics, Taloustieteet, Business and Economics, Jyväskylän yliopisto, University of Jyväskylä
Format: Master's thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access: https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/76676
_version_ 1826225764810358784
author Koskinen, Jenna
author2 Kauppakorkeakoulu School of Business and Economics Taloustieteet Business and Economics Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_facet Koskinen, Jenna Kauppakorkeakoulu School of Business and Economics Taloustieteet Business and Economics Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä Koskinen, Jenna Kauppakorkeakoulu School of Business and Economics Taloustieteet Business and Economics Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_sort Koskinen, Jenna
datasource_str_mv jyx
description Tämä tutkimus käsittelee julkista metsäkeskustelua Maaseudun Tulevaisuuden sekä Helsingin sanomien mielipidekirjoituspalstoilla vuosien 2019 ja 2020 aikana. Tutki-muksen tarkoituksena on erottaa keskustelusta diskursseja, tunnistaa vallitseva hegemonia sekä tutkia diskurssien välisiä suhteita. Lisäksi, tutkimustulosten perusteella työ pohtii ja ottaa kantaa metsäteollisuuden sekä maaseudun kehitykseen. Metsäkeskustelussa korostui etenkin mielipiteet metsänhoitomenetelmistä ja näiden ekologisuudesta sekä taloudellisista hyödyistä. Tutkimuksessa tunnistettiin kaksi diskurssikoalitiota: muutoksen vastustajat (Resistance to change) sekä muutoksen ajajat (Change chasers). Muutoksen vastustajat tukevat vallitsevia metsätalouden käytäntöjä sekä metsäpolitiikkaa. Koalitio muodostuu kahdesta diskurssista, jotka ovat metsänomistajadiskurssi (Forester discourse) ja biotalousdiskurssi (Bioeconomy discourse). Näiden diskurssien eriävät tavoitteet luovat kuilua koalition sisälle ja näin myös regiimin. Muutoksen ajajat koalitio koostuu kolmesta diskurssista: kestävän tuotannon diskurssi (Sustainable production discourse), virkistysdiskurssi (Recreation discourse) sekä luonnonsuojelijadiskurssi (Conservationist discourse). Kestävän tuotannon diskurssissa kannatetaan puun tuotantoa jatkuvan kasvatuksen menetelmällä, kun taas luonnonsuojelijadiskurssi ei anna metsälle taloudellista arvoa, vaan puhuu luonnonsuojelun puolesta. Virkistysdiskurssi painottaa metsien virkistyskäyttöä ja tämän liiketoimintamahdollisuuksia. Muutoksen ajajat koalitio painottaa metsien ympäristöarvoja ylitse taloudellisen hyödyn, ja siksi kritisoi hegemoniaa sekä haluaa tuoda muutosta vallitseviin metsänhoitotapoihin. This research examines the public forest discussion in Maaseudun Tulevaisuus and Helsingin Sanomat newspapers taken place during 2019-2020. This research aims to identify discourses emerging from the discussion, to reveal the hegemony and scrutinize the interconnections between the discourses. In addition, on the grounds of the previous research, the trajectory of the forest-based sector and rural development potential are discussed. The public forest discussion emphasized the considerations and opinions on the most adequate forest management methods and their environmental sustainability and economic benefits. Two coalitions were identified from the discussion: hegemonic Resistance to change coalition and Change chasers coalition. Resistance to change coalition supports the current prevailing forest practices and forest policy and appreciates forest’s economic value. The coalition consists of two discourses: Forester discourse and Bioeconomy discourse. The distinctive objectives of the Forester and Bioeconomy discourses are creating dissonance within the Resistance to change coalition and the forest regime. The subordinate Change chasers coalition involves three discourses: Sustainable production discourse, Recreation discourse and Conservationist discourse. Sustainable production discourse supports wood production with continuous cover silviculture, whereas the Conservationist discourse does not give forests economic value but advocates the nature conservation. Recreation discourse gives emphasis on the forest’s recreational utilization and its business potential. Altogether, the Change chasers coalition appreciates the forests environmental values more than the material economic utilization and thus criticizes the hegemony and the intensive forest management practices.
first_indexed 2021-06-18T20:01:28Z
format Pro gradu
free_online_boolean 1
fullrecord [{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "N\u00e4yh\u00e4, Annukka", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Kuhmonen, Irene", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Koskinen, Jenna", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2021-06-18T06:49:43Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2021-06-18T06:49:43Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2021", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/76676", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "T\u00e4m\u00e4 tutkimus k\u00e4sittelee julkista mets\u00e4keskustelua Maaseudun Tulevaisuuden sek\u00e4 Helsingin sanomien mielipidekirjoituspalstoilla vuosien 2019 ja 2020 aikana. Tutki-muksen tarkoituksena on erottaa keskustelusta diskursseja, tunnistaa vallitseva hegemonia sek\u00e4 tutkia diskurssien v\u00e4lisi\u00e4 suhteita. Lis\u00e4ksi, tutkimustulosten perusteella ty\u00f6 pohtii ja ottaa kantaa mets\u00e4teollisuuden sek\u00e4 maaseudun kehitykseen.\n\nMets\u00e4keskustelussa korostui etenkin mielipiteet mets\u00e4nhoitomenetelmist\u00e4 ja n\u00e4iden ekologisuudesta sek\u00e4 taloudellisista hy\u00f6dyist\u00e4. Tutkimuksessa tunnistettiin kaksi diskurssikoalitiota: muutoksen vastustajat (Resistance to change) sek\u00e4 muutoksen ajajat (Change chasers). Muutoksen vastustajat tukevat vallitsevia mets\u00e4talouden k\u00e4yt\u00e4nt\u00f6j\u00e4 sek\u00e4 mets\u00e4politiikkaa. Koalitio muodostuu kahdesta diskurssista, jotka ovat mets\u00e4nomistajadiskurssi (Forester discourse) ja biotalousdiskurssi (Bioeconomy discourse). N\u00e4iden diskurssien eri\u00e4v\u00e4t tavoitteet luovat kuilua koalition sis\u00e4lle ja n\u00e4in my\u00f6s regiimin. Muutoksen ajajat koalitio koostuu kolmesta diskurssista: kest\u00e4v\u00e4n tuotannon diskurssi (Sustainable production discourse), virkistysdiskurssi (Recreation discourse) sek\u00e4 luonnonsuojelijadiskurssi (Conservationist discourse). Kest\u00e4v\u00e4n tuotannon diskurssissa kannatetaan puun tuotantoa jatkuvan kasvatuksen menetelm\u00e4ll\u00e4, kun taas luonnonsuojelijadiskurssi ei anna mets\u00e4lle taloudellista arvoa, vaan puhuu luonnonsuojelun puolesta. Virkistysdiskurssi painottaa metsien virkistysk\u00e4ytt\u00f6\u00e4 ja t\u00e4m\u00e4n liiketoimintamahdollisuuksia. Muutoksen ajajat koalitio painottaa metsien ymp\u00e4rist\u00f6arvoja ylitse taloudellisen hy\u00f6dyn, ja siksi kritisoi hegemoniaa sek\u00e4 haluaa tuoda muutosta vallitseviin mets\u00e4nhoitotapoihin.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "This research examines the public forest discussion in Maaseudun Tulevaisuus and Helsingin Sanomat newspapers taken place during 2019-2020. This research aims to identify discourses emerging from the discussion, to reveal the hegemony and scrutinize the interconnections between the discourses. In addition, on the grounds of the previous research, the trajectory of the forest-based sector and rural development potential are discussed.\n\nThe public forest discussion emphasized the considerations and opinions on the most adequate forest management methods and their environmental sustainability and economic benefits. Two coalitions were identified from the discussion: hegemonic Resistance to change coalition and Change chasers coalition. Resistance to change coalition supports the current prevailing forest practices and forest policy and appreciates forest\u2019s economic value. The coalition consists of two discourses: Forester discourse and Bioeconomy discourse. The distinctive objectives of the Forester and Bioeconomy discourses are creating dissonance within the Resistance to change coalition and the forest regime. The subordinate Change chasers coalition involves three discourses: Sustainable production discourse, Recreation discourse and Conservationist discourse. Sustainable production discourse supports wood production with continuous cover silviculture, whereas the Conservationist discourse does not give forests economic value but advocates the nature conservation. Recreation discourse gives emphasis on the forest\u2019s recreational utilization and its business potential. Altogether, the Change chasers coalition appreciates the forests environmental values more than the material economic utilization and thus criticizes the hegemony and the intensive forest management practices.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Paivi Vuorio (paelvuor@jyu.fi) on 2021-06-18T06:49:43Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-18T06:49:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2021", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "62", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "forest-based sector", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Forest discussion in Finland : do we see beoynd the pine tree?", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202106183873", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4 University School of Business and Economics", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopiston kauppakorkeakoulu", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Taloustieteet", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Business and Economics", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Yritysten ymp\u00e4rist\u00f6johtaminen", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Corporate Environmental Management", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.initiative", "value": "university", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "initiative", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "20425", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "koalitiot", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "diskurssi", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "mets\u00e4t", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "mets\u00e4talous", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "mets\u00e4nhoito", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "diskurssianalyysi", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "biotalous", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "coalitions (organisations)", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "discourse", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "forests", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "forestry", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "silviculture", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "discourse analysis", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "bioeconomy", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.okm", "value": "G2", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "okm", "schema": "dc"}]
id jyx.123456789_76676
language eng
last_indexed 2025-02-18T10:54:33Z
main_date 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
main_date_str 2021
online_boolean 1
online_urls_str_mv {"url":"https:\/\/jyx.jyu.fi\/bitstreams\/af7f630d-984b-42c9-a9a4-c2c5e0daa085\/download","text":"URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202106183873.pdf","source":"jyx","mediaType":"application\/pdf"}
publishDate 2021
record_format qdc
source_str_mv jyx
spellingShingle Koskinen, Jenna Forest discussion in Finland : do we see beoynd the pine tree? forest-based sector Yritysten ympäristöjohtaminen Corporate Environmental Management 20425 koalitiot diskurssi metsät metsätalous metsänhoito diskurssianalyysi biotalous coalitions (organisations) discourse forests forestry silviculture discourse analysis bioeconomy
title Forest discussion in Finland : do we see beoynd the pine tree?
title_full Forest discussion in Finland : do we see beoynd the pine tree?
title_fullStr Forest discussion in Finland : do we see beoynd the pine tree? Forest discussion in Finland : do we see beoynd the pine tree?
title_full_unstemmed Forest discussion in Finland : do we see beoynd the pine tree? Forest discussion in Finland : do we see beoynd the pine tree?
title_short Forest discussion in Finland
title_sort forest discussion in finland do we see beoynd the pine tree
title_sub do we see beoynd the pine tree?
title_txtP Forest discussion in Finland : do we see beoynd the pine tree?
topic forest-based sector Yritysten ympäristöjohtaminen Corporate Environmental Management 20425 koalitiot diskurssi metsät metsätalous metsänhoito diskurssianalyysi biotalous coalitions (organisations) discourse forests forestry silviculture discourse analysis bioeconomy
topic_facet 20425 Corporate Environmental Management Yritysten ympäristöjohtaminen bioeconomy biotalous coalitions (organisations) discourse discourse analysis diskurssi diskurssianalyysi forest-based sector forestry forests koalitiot metsänhoito metsät metsätalous silviculture
url https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/76676 http://www.urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202106183873
work_keys_str_mv AT koskinenjenna forestdiscussioninfinlanddoweseebeoyndthepinetree