| fullrecord |
[{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Prozorov, Sergei", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Kyyr\u00f6nen, Otto", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2021-05-20T11:01:58Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2021-05-20T11:01:58Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2021", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/75800", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "T\u00e4m\u00e4n tutkielman tarkoitus on vertailla monopolip\u00e4\u00e4omateorian ja voiton suhdeluvun laskutendenssin teorian esitt\u00e4mi\u00e4 selityksi\u00e4 vuosien 2007\u20132009 finanssikriisille ja paikantaa n\u00e4iden selitysten suhteelliset vahvuudet ja heikkoudet. Koska suurten osakeyhti\u00f6iden (ts. monopolien) olemassaolo on ollut kiist\u00e4m\u00e4t\u00f6n tosiasia 1800-luvun lopulta l\u00e4htien, tutkin my\u00f6s, miss\u00e4 m\u00e4\u00e4rin on p\u00e4tev\u00e4\u00e4 argumentoida, ett\u00e4 n\u00e4iden suuryhti\u00f6iden synty muunsi kapitalismin kriisitendenssej\u00e4 ja johti lopulta vuosien 2007\u20132009 finanssikriisiin.\n\nMonopolip\u00e4\u00e4omateoria korostaa suurten osakeyhti\u00f6iden mullistavaa vaikutusta kapitalismin modus operandiin: suuryhti\u00f6t h\u00e4vitt\u00e4v\u00e4t hintakilpailun ja synnytt\u00e4v\u00e4t liiallista tuotantokapasiteettia ja stagnaatiota. Monopolip\u00e4\u00e4omakoulukunnan j\u00e4senet rakentavat tulkintansa vuosien 2007\u20132009 finanssikriisin syist\u00e4 juuri n\u00e4iden tekij\u00f6iden varaan. T\u00e4t\u00e4 vastoin voiton suhdeluvun laskutendenssin teoria argumentoi, ett\u00e4 suuret osakeyhti\u00f6t eiv\u00e4t ole muuntaneet kapitalistisia kriisitendenssej\u00e4 laadullisesti ja ett\u00e4 voiton suhdeluvun laskutendenssiin ep\u00e4suorasti liittyv\u00e4t yhteiskunnalliset prosessit ja mekanismit aiheuttivat vuosien 2007\u20132009 finanssikriisin.\n\nArgumenttini on, ett\u00e4 voiton suhdeluvun laskutendenssin teoria tarjoaa sek\u00e4 p\u00e4tev\u00e4mm\u00e4n selityksen vuosien 2007\u20132009 finanssikriisille ett\u00e4 vahvemman viitekehyksen kapitalististen kriisien tutkimiseksi kuin monopolip\u00e4\u00e4omateoria, koska edellinen liikkuu metodologisesti tuotantosuhteista markkinasuhteisiin ja j\u00e4lkimm\u00e4inen toimii p\u00e4invastoin. Tuotantokeskeinen metodologinen l\u00e4hestymistapa sallii voiton suhdeluvun laskutendenssin teorian tarkastella kokonaisvaltaisesti niit\u00e4 ilmi\u00f6it\u00e4, joita tuotannon ulkoistaminen Yhdysvalloista maailmantalouden periferiaan 1980-luvulta alkaen on luonut. Kyseiset ilmi\u00f6t synnyttiv\u00e4t Yhdysvalloissa sek\u00e4 kysynt\u00e4\u00e4 kulutusluotolle ett\u00e4 tarjontaa ja kysynt\u00e4\u00e4 uusille rahoitustuotteille. Lopulta n\u00e4m\u00e4 globaalilla tasolla operoivat yhteiskunnalliset prosessit johtivat vuosien 2007\u20132009 finanssikriisiin.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "The objective of this thesis is to assess the comparable strengths and weaknesses of the explanations that monopoly capital theory and the falling-profit-rate theory have provided for the 2007\u201309 financial crisis. Furthermore, insofar as the existence of large joint-stock companies (i.e. monopolies) has been an undeniable fact since the late nineteenth century, I study whether or not it is viable to argue that the ascent of these large companies altered the crisis tendencies inherent to capitalism and, ultimately, helped produce the 2007\u201309 financial crisis.\n\nMonopoly capital theory highlights the transformational impact of large joint-stock companies on the modus operandi of capitalism in the sense that these large companies abolish price competition and give rise to excess productive capacity and stagnation. The members of the monopoly capital school refer to these factors in their interpretation of the causes of the 2007\u201309 financial crisis as well. Conversely, the falling-profit-rate theory argues that large joint-stock companies have introduced no qualitative rupture in capitalist crisis tendencies, and that the 2007\u201309 financial crisis was generated by social processes and mechanisms related to the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, albeit indirectly.\n\nMy argument is that the falling-profit-rate theory provides a more viable explanation for the 2007\u201309 financial crisis and a stronger framework for studying capitalist crises than monopoly capital theory because the former moves methodologically from relations of production towards market relations, whereas the latter does the opposite. The production-centred methodological approach allows the falling-profit-rate theory to consider the full impact of the offshoring of manufacturing from the U.S. to the periphery of the world economy since the 1980s which, in turn, generated demand for consumer debt and supply and demand for new financial products in the United States. Ultimately, these social processes, which operated on the global scale, led to the 2007\u201309 financial crisis.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Paivi Vuorio (paelvuor@jyu.fi) on 2021-05-20T11:01:58Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T11:01:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2021", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "102", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "monopoly capital", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "rate of profit", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "crisis theory", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Debating the causes of the 2007\u201309 financial crisis : monopoly capital versus the tendency of the rate of profit to fall", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202105203062", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Valtio-oppi", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Political Science", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "208", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "finanssikriisit", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "monopolit", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "kapitalismi", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "financial crises", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "monopolies", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "capitalism", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.okm", "value": "G2", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "okm", "schema": "dc"}]
|