| fullrecord |
[{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Moisio, Olli-Pekka", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Manninen, Tuomas", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2020-06-25T05:29:52Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2020-06-25T05:29:52Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2020", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/70899", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "T\u00e4t\u00e4 tutkielmaa ohjaa kaksiosainen kysymys: Onnistuuko J\u00fcrgen Habermas p\u00e4ivitt\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4n\nkriittisen teorian ensimm\u00e4isen sukupolven m\u00e4\u00e4rittelem\u00e4n v\u00e4lineellisen j\u00e4rjen kritiikin?\nTarjoaako h\u00e4nen kommunikatiivisen toiminnan teoriassa tekem\u00e4ns\u00e4 erottelu systeemin ja\nel\u00e4mismaailman v\u00e4lill\u00e4 tyydytt\u00e4v\u00e4n perustan t\u00e4lle?\nTutkimusta motivoi v\u00e4lineellisen j\u00e4rjen k\u00e4sitteen ja ongelman keskeisyys kriittiselle\nteorialle koko teoriaperinteen monikymmenvuotisen historian ajan. Ensimm\u00e4isen\nsukupolven teoreetikoista erityisesti Max Horkheimer tunnetaan k\u00e4sitteen kehittelij\u00e4n\u00e4,\njoten tutkielma sis\u00e4lt\u00e4\u00e4 lyhyen katsauksen my\u00f6s h\u00e4nen ajatteluunsa relevanteilta osin.\nHorkheimeriin kytkeytyen k\u00e4sittelen my\u00f6s Max Weberin formaalin j\u00e4rjen k\u00e4sitett\u00e4.\nHabermasin ajattelu jaetaan yleens\u00e4 kolmeen paradigmaattiseen vaiheeseen, ja\ntutkielmassani pureudun n\u00e4ist\u00e4 viimeiseen, kommunikatiivisen toiminnan teoriaan.\nTarkasteluni keski\u00f6ss\u00e4 olevan rationaalisuustematiikan kannalta t\u00e4rke\u00e4ksi nousee\nHabermasin erottelu el\u00e4mismaailman ja systeemin v\u00e4lille. Habermasille yhteiskunnallinen\nsysteemi n\u00e4ytt\u00e4ytyy strategisen, v\u00e4lineellist\u00e4 laskelmointia painottavan j\u00e4rkiper\u00e4isyyden\npiirin\u00e4. T\u00e4m\u00e4n teoreettisena vastinparina on el\u00e4mismaailma, er\u00e4\u00e4nlainen yksil\u00f6iden\njokap\u00e4iv\u00e4ist\u00e4 olemista sen taustalla m\u00e4\u00e4ritt\u00e4v\u00e4 horisontti, joka n\u00e4ytt\u00e4ytyy\nkommunikatiivisen, yhteisymm\u00e4rrykseen pyrkiv\u00e4n j\u00e4rkiper\u00e4isyyden alueena. N\u00e4ist\u00e4\nk\u00e4sitteist\u00e4 pureudun erityisesti el\u00e4mismaailman tematiikkaan, sill\u00e4 el\u00e4mismaailmallisessa,\naidosti kommunikatiivisessa toiminnassa on l\u00f6ydett\u00e4viss\u00e4 mahdollisuus systeemisten\nimperatiivien vastustamiselle. T\u00e4ten k\u00e4sittelen my\u00f6s el\u00e4mismaailman k\u00e4sitteen\nfenomenologisia juuria Edmund Husserlin ja Alfred Sch\u00fctzin kautta.\nTutkielmani lopputulema on, ett\u00e4 Habermas tarjoaa mielenkiintoisen uuden n\u00e4k\u00f6kulman\nv\u00e4lineellisen j\u00e4rjen kritiikkiin ja laventaa j\u00e4rjellisyyden tematiikkaan liittyv\u00e4\u00e4 k\u00e4sitteist\u00f6\u00e4.\nParadigmanvaihdoksen my\u00f6t\u00e4 n\u00e4ytt\u00e4\u00e4 kuitenkin silt\u00e4, ett\u00e4 jonkinlaista merkityskatoa\naiempaan kriittiseen teoriaan n\u00e4hden on tapahtunut, ja t\u00e4m\u00e4n my\u00f6t\u00e4 her\u00e4\u00e4 kysymys,\ntylsistyyk\u00f6 kriittisen teorian ter\u00e4 kommunikatiiviseen paradigmaan siirrytt\u00e4ess\u00e4.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "This thesis is guided by a twofold question: does J\u00fcrgen Habermas succeed in his attempt\nto update the critique of instrumental reason paraphrased by the first generation of the\nFrankfurt school? Does his conceptual diffenrentiation between system and lifeworld,\nintroduced in the theory of communicative action, offer an adequate basis for this?\nThe research is motivated by the centrality of the theme of instrumental reason for the\nwhole, decades-long project of critical theory. Especially Max Horkheimer is known as the\nmost prominent developer of this concept among the first generation of Frankfurt scholars.\nThe thesis offers a brief summary of Horkheimer's work relating the matter, alongside Max\nWeber's work, which influenced Horkheimer greatly.\nHabermas' work is usually divided to three paradigmatic phases, of which the thesis tackles\nthe last one, the theory of communicative action. For Habermas' understanding of reason,\nthe conceptual division of system and lifeworld is of central importance. Habermas views\nthe system as an area of strategic, instrumental rationality of cold calculation. Alongside\nthe system we have lifeworld, characterised by communicative rationality with primary\naim of seeking understanding. This work focuses on the concept of lifeworld, because in\nthe authentic, communicative action within the lifeworld there is a possibility to resist the\nimperatives imposed upon us by the system. The thesis offers also a brief overview of the\nphenomenological basis of lifeworld by Edmund Husserl and Alfred Sch\u00fctz.\nThe conclusion of the thesis is that Habermas offers an interesting and original viewpoint\nto the critique of instrumental reason, and manages to widen the conceptual toolset\nregarding the matter. However, the shift in paradigm seems to come with a loss of meaning\nin relation to the original critical theory. This raises a question: does the paradigm shift to\nthe theory of communicative action lead to a bland theory, without the same critical\npotential as before?", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Miia Hakanen (mihakane@jyu.fi) on 2020-06-25T05:29:52Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2020-06-25T05:29:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2020", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "68", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "fin", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "J\u00fcrgen Habermas", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "v\u00e4lineellinen j\u00e4rki", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "systeemi", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Onko t\u00e4ss\u00e4 yhteiskunnassa mit\u00e4\u00e4n j\u00e4rke\u00e4? : J\u00fcrgen Habermasin el\u00e4mismaailman ja systeemin k\u00e4site-erottelu v\u00e4lineellisen j\u00e4rjen kritiikin p\u00e4ivityksen\u00e4", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202006255089", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Filosofia", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Philosophy", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "201", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "kriittinen teoria", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "yhteiskuntateoriat", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "yhteiskuntafilosofia", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "el\u00e4mismaailma", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "kommunikatiivisen toiminnan teoria", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "rationaalisuus", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "filosofia", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.okm", "value": "G2", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "okm", "schema": "dc"}]
|