Attitudes towards biometric authentication technologies between cultures acceptance in Finland And Brazil

Biometrinen todennus hyödyntää käyttäjän fyysisiä ominaisuuksia, kuten sormenjälkeä tai silmää. Biometristä tunnistetta ei tarvitse muistaa, eikä sitä voi unohtaa tai varastaa. Uudenlaiset ongelmat ja uhat kuitenkin koskettavat biometriaa. Käyttäjät eivät myöskään aina hyväksy biometriaa. Hyväksyntä...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Liljander, Akseli
Other Authors: Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta, Faculty of Information Technology, Informaatioteknologia, Information Technology, Jyväskylän yliopisto, University of Jyväskylä
Format: Master's thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access: https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/66405
_version_ 1826225754814283776
author Liljander, Akseli
author2 Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta Faculty of Information Technology Informaatioteknologia Information Technology Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_facet Liljander, Akseli Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta Faculty of Information Technology Informaatioteknologia Information Technology Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä Liljander, Akseli Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta Faculty of Information Technology Informaatioteknologia Information Technology Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_sort Liljander, Akseli
datasource_str_mv jyx
description Biometrinen todennus hyödyntää käyttäjän fyysisiä ominaisuuksia, kuten sormenjälkeä tai silmää. Biometristä tunnistetta ei tarvitse muistaa, eikä sitä voi unohtaa tai varastaa. Uudenlaiset ongelmat ja uhat kuitenkin koskettavat biometriaa. Käyttäjät eivät myöskään aina hyväksy biometriaa. Hyväksyntä voi vaihdella maiden ja kulttuurien välillä. Suurin osa biometrian hyväksynnän tutkimuksesta on toteutettu Euroopassa ja Pohjois-Amerikassa. Etelä-Amerikka on nouseva biometrian keskeinen markkina-alue, mutta siellä ei ole toteutettu tutkimuksia biometrian hyväksynnästä. Brasiliaa ja Suomea vertailtiin kvantitatiivisessa kyselytutkimuksessa, jossa yhdistettiin Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) -malli ja Hofsteden teoria kulttuurin ulottuvuuksista. Aikomus käyttää, tuttuus ja tietoisuus biometriaa koskien olivat korkeampia Brasiliassa. Suurin osa oletetuista TAM-mallin riippuvuussuhteista löydettiin vähintään yhdessä maassa, mutta malli ei ollut täysin toistettavissa kummassakaan niistä. Brasilialaiset vastaajat kokivat biometrian hyödyllisempänä, kun heillä oli korkeampi turvallisuuden tarve, ja he näkivät oman kehonsa sisällyttämisen autentikointiprosessissa vähemmän tunkeilevana kuin suomalaiset. Toisin kuin brasilialaiset, suomalaiset vastaajat eivät suosineet biometriaa tapana parantaa henkilökoh-taista turvallisuuttaan, eivätkä nähneet helppokäyttöisyyttä tarpeeksi vahvana tekijänä vaikuttamaan käyttöaikeisiin. Hofsteden dimensiot eivät tarjonneet selkeää selitystä hyväksynnän muodostumisen eroille maiden välillä. Jotkut omak-sutut kulttuuriarvot vaikuttivat epäsuorasti biometrian käyttöaikeisiin. Tuloksia voidaan hyödyntää tulevassa biometrian hyväksynnän tutkimuksessa, sekä käytännössä tuodessa biometrisia tuotteita markkinoille eri kulttuuriympäristöissä. Biometric authentication is based on the physical qualities, such as fingerprint or eye, of the user. Biometrics do not need remembering and cannot be stolen or lost. However, new types of problems and threats concern biometrics. Biometrics are also not always accepted by users. Acceptance may vary between countries and cultures. Most biometrics acceptance research has been conducted in Europe and North America. South America is an emerging key market of biometrics, but no studies on biometrics acceptance have been conducted there. An extended Techology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Hofstede’s cultural dimension theory were combined in a quantitative survey to compare familiarity, knowledge and ac-ceptance of biometrics between Brazil and Finland. Intention to use, familiarity and knowledge of biometrics were higher in Brazil. Most hypothesized TAM-relationships were found in at least one of the countries, but the model was not completely repeatable in either. Brazilian respondents perceived biometrics as more useful when they had a higher need for security, and they saw involving their body in the authentication process less invasive than their Finnish counter-parts. Unlike Brazilians, The Finnish respondents did not favor biometrics as a way of increasing their personal security nor see ease of use as a strong enough factor to directly affect usage intentions. Hofstede’s dimensions did not provide a clear explanation for the differences in acceptance formation. Some espoused cultural values affected the intention to use biometrics indirectly. The results offer valuable implications for future biometrics acceptance research and in practice for introducing biometric products in different cultural contexts.
first_indexed 2019-11-15T21:00:46Z
format Pro gradu
free_online_boolean 1
fullrecord [{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Naomi, Woods", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Liljander, Akseli", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2019-11-15T13:52:03Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2019-11-15T13:52:03Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2019", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/66405", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Biometrinen todennus hy\u00f6dynt\u00e4\u00e4 k\u00e4ytt\u00e4j\u00e4n fyysisi\u00e4 ominaisuuksia, kuten sormenj\u00e4lke\u00e4 tai silm\u00e4\u00e4. Biometrist\u00e4 tunnistetta ei tarvitse muistaa, eik\u00e4 sit\u00e4 voi unohtaa tai varastaa. Uudenlaiset ongelmat ja uhat kuitenkin koskettavat biometriaa. K\u00e4ytt\u00e4j\u00e4t eiv\u00e4t my\u00f6sk\u00e4\u00e4n aina hyv\u00e4ksy biometriaa. Hyv\u00e4ksynt\u00e4 voi vaihdella maiden ja kulttuurien v\u00e4lill\u00e4. Suurin osa biometrian hyv\u00e4ksynn\u00e4n tutkimuksesta on toteutettu Euroopassa ja Pohjois-Amerikassa. Etel\u00e4-Amerikka on nouseva biometrian keskeinen markkina-alue, mutta siell\u00e4 ei ole toteutettu tutkimuksia biometrian hyv\u00e4ksynn\u00e4st\u00e4. Brasiliaa ja Suomea vertailtiin kvantitatiivisessa kyselytutkimuksessa, jossa yhdistettiin Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) -malli ja Hofsteden teoria kulttuurin ulottuvuuksista. Aikomus k\u00e4ytt\u00e4\u00e4, tuttuus ja tietoisuus biometriaa koskien olivat korkeampia Brasiliassa. Suurin osa oletetuista TAM-mallin riippuvuussuhteista l\u00f6ydettiin v\u00e4hint\u00e4\u00e4n yhdess\u00e4 maassa, mutta malli ei ollut t\u00e4ysin toistettavissa kummassakaan niist\u00e4. Brasilialaiset vastaajat kokivat biometrian hy\u00f6dyllisemp\u00e4n\u00e4, kun heill\u00e4 oli korkeampi turvallisuuden tarve, ja he n\u00e4kiv\u00e4t oman kehonsa sis\u00e4llytt\u00e4misen autentikointiprosessissa v\u00e4hemm\u00e4n tunkeilevana kuin suomalaiset. Toisin kuin brasilialaiset, suomalaiset vastaajat eiv\u00e4t suosineet biometriaa tapana parantaa henkil\u00f6koh-taista turvallisuuttaan, eiv\u00e4tk\u00e4 n\u00e4hneet helppok\u00e4ytt\u00f6isyytt\u00e4 tarpeeksi vahvana tekij\u00e4n\u00e4 vaikuttamaan k\u00e4ytt\u00f6aikeisiin. Hofsteden dimensiot eiv\u00e4t tarjonneet selke\u00e4\u00e4 selityst\u00e4 hyv\u00e4ksynn\u00e4n muodostumisen eroille maiden v\u00e4lill\u00e4. Jotkut omak-sutut kulttuuriarvot vaikuttivat ep\u00e4suorasti biometrian k\u00e4ytt\u00f6aikeisiin. Tuloksia voidaan hy\u00f6dynt\u00e4\u00e4 tulevassa biometrian hyv\u00e4ksynn\u00e4n tutkimuksessa, sek\u00e4 k\u00e4yt\u00e4nn\u00f6ss\u00e4 tuodessa biometrisia tuotteita markkinoille eri kulttuuriymp\u00e4rist\u00f6iss\u00e4.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Biometric authentication is based on the physical qualities, such as fingerprint or eye, of the user. Biometrics do not need remembering and cannot be stolen or lost. However, new types of problems and threats concern biometrics. Biometrics are also not always accepted by users. Acceptance may vary between countries and cultures. Most biometrics acceptance research has been conducted in Europe and North America. South America is an emerging key market of biometrics, but no studies on biometrics acceptance have been conducted there. An extended Techology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Hofstede\u2019s cultural dimension theory were combined in a quantitative survey to compare familiarity, knowledge and ac-ceptance of biometrics between Brazil and Finland. Intention to use, familiarity and knowledge of biometrics were higher in Brazil. Most hypothesized TAM-relationships were found in at least one of the countries, but the model was not completely repeatable in either. Brazilian respondents perceived biometrics as more useful when they had a higher need for security, and they saw involving their body in the authentication process less invasive than their Finnish counter-parts. Unlike Brazilians, The Finnish respondents did not favor biometrics as a way of increasing their personal security nor see ease of use as a strong enough factor to directly affect usage intentions. Hofstede\u2019s dimensions did not provide a clear explanation for the differences in acceptance formation. Some espoused cultural values affected the intention to use biometrics indirectly. The results offer valuable implications for future biometrics acceptance research and in practice for introducing biometric products in different cultural contexts.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Miia Hakanen (mihakane@jyu.fi) on 2019-11-15T13:52:03Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-15T13:52:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2019", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "117", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "biometric authentication", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "technology acceptance", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Technology Acceptance Model", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Hofstede\u2019s cultural dimensions", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Brazil", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Finland", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Attitudes towards biometric authentication technologies between cultures : acceptance in Finland And Brazil", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201911154909", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Information Technology", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Informaatioteknologia", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Information Technology", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Tietoj\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4tiede", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Information Systems Science", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "601", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "biotunnistus", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "kulttuurierot", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "kulttuuri", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "biometria", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "tunnistaminen", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "tietotekniikka", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "teknologia", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "kulttuurien tutkimus", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "biometric identification", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "cultural differences", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "culture", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "biometry", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "recognition", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "information technology", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "technology (information)", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "study of cultures", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.okm", "value": "G2", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "okm", "schema": "dc"}]
id jyx.123456789_66405
language eng
last_indexed 2025-02-18T10:54:21Z
main_date 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
main_date_str 2019
online_boolean 1
online_urls_str_mv {"url":"https:\/\/jyx.jyu.fi\/bitstreams\/99e1d1df-dff6-431a-963f-b1d36675fa8c\/download","text":"URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201911154909.pdf","source":"jyx","mediaType":"application\/pdf"}
publishDate 2019
record_format qdc
source_str_mv jyx
spellingShingle Liljander, Akseli Attitudes towards biometric authentication technologies between cultures : acceptance in Finland And Brazil biometric authentication technology acceptance Technology Acceptance Model Hofstede’s cultural dimensions Brazil Finland Tietojärjestelmätiede Information Systems Science 601 biotunnistus kulttuurierot kulttuuri biometria tunnistaminen tietotekniikka teknologia kulttuurien tutkimus biometric identification cultural differences culture biometry recognition information technology technology (information) study of cultures
title Attitudes towards biometric authentication technologies between cultures : acceptance in Finland And Brazil
title_full Attitudes towards biometric authentication technologies between cultures : acceptance in Finland And Brazil
title_fullStr Attitudes towards biometric authentication technologies between cultures : acceptance in Finland And Brazil Attitudes towards biometric authentication technologies between cultures : acceptance in Finland And Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes towards biometric authentication technologies between cultures : acceptance in Finland And Brazil Attitudes towards biometric authentication technologies between cultures : acceptance in Finland And Brazil
title_short Attitudes towards biometric authentication technologies between cultures
title_sort attitudes towards biometric authentication technologies between cultures acceptance in finland and brazil
title_sub acceptance in Finland And Brazil
title_txtP Attitudes towards biometric authentication technologies between cultures : acceptance in Finland And Brazil
topic biometric authentication technology acceptance Technology Acceptance Model Hofstede’s cultural dimensions Brazil Finland Tietojärjestelmätiede Information Systems Science 601 biotunnistus kulttuurierot kulttuuri biometria tunnistaminen tietotekniikka teknologia kulttuurien tutkimus biometric identification cultural differences culture biometry recognition information technology technology (information) study of cultures
topic_facet 601 Brazil Finland Hofstede’s cultural dimensions Information Systems Science Technology Acceptance Model Tietojärjestelmätiede biometria biometric authentication biometric identification biometry biotunnistus cultural differences culture information technology kulttuuri kulttuurien tutkimus kulttuurierot recognition study of cultures technology (information) technology acceptance teknologia tietotekniikka tunnistaminen
url https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/66405 http://www.urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201911154909
work_keys_str_mv AT liljanderakseli attitudestowardsbiometricauthenticationtechnologiesbetweenculturesacceptanceinfi