| fullrecord |
[{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Yrj\u00f6nsuuri, Mikko", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Vesterinen, Oskari", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2019-10-24T05:26:02Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2019-10-24T05:26:02Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2019", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/66009", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "T\u00e4m\u00e4n tutkielman tarkoituksena on tutkia tietoisen eli ns. \u201dvahvan\u201d teko\u00e4lyn mahdollisuutta. Tutkielma l\u00e4hestyy tutkimuskysymyst\u00e4\u00e4n kolmen keskeisen n\u00e4k\u00f6kulman kautta: Alan Turingin esitt\u00e4m\u00e4n Turingin testin, filosofi John Searlen esitt\u00e4m\u00e4n kiinalaisen huoneen argumentin, sek\u00e4 kehollisen kognition kautta. Turingin testi edustaa varhaista yrityst\u00e4 mitata koneiden tietoisuutta empiirisesti, mutta osoittautuu t\u00e4h\u00e4n tarkoitukseen riitt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00f6m\u00e4ksi. Kiinalaisen huoneen argumentti on klassinen ajatuskoe, joka v\u00e4itetysti kumoaa vahvan teko\u00e4lyn mahdollisuuden, ja joka kiistanalaisuudestaan huolimatta tarjoaa vahvoja vastalauseita tietoisen teko\u00e4lyn suhteen sik\u00e4li kun ne ymm\u00e4rret\u00e4\u00e4n kehottomina, symbolipohjaisina ohjelmistoina. Kehollista kognitiota l\u00e4hestyt\u00e4\u00e4n ensin tunnetulla \u201daivot vadissa\u201d -ajatuskokeella, ja sen j\u00e4lkeen k\u00e4yt\u00e4nn\u00f6llisemm\u00e4n l\u00e4hestymistavan kautta, joka voi tuottaa filosofisia edistysaskelia kiinalaisen huoneen argumentin suhteen.\n\nKeskeinen l\u00f6yt\u00f6 n\u00e4ist\u00e4 n\u00e4k\u00f6kulmista on, ettei vahvan teko\u00e4lyn mahdollisuutta voi varmuudella osoittaa mahdolliseksi tai mahdottomaksi nykyisen kognition ja tietoisuuden ymm\u00e4rryksemme pohjalta. Varmoja johtop\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksi\u00e4 rajoittavia tekij\u00f6it\u00e4 ovat ensinn\u00e4kin se, ettemme tunne tietoisuuden v\u00e4ltt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00f6mi\u00e4 reunaehtoja, sek\u00e4 toiseksi se, ett\u00e4 yritt\u00e4ess\u00e4mme m\u00e4\u00e4ritt\u00e4\u00e4 sit\u00e4, ovatko \u00e4lykk\u00e4\u00e4sti k\u00e4ytt\u00e4ytyv\u00e4t teko\u00e4lyt tai koneet tietoisia vai eiv\u00e4t, t\u00f6rm\u00e4\u00e4mme muiden mielten ongelmaan.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the possibility of conscious artificial intelligence, or Strong AI. The thesis approaches its research question through three main perspectives: the Turing Test by Alan Turing, the Chinese room argument by philosopher John Searle, and embodied cognition, each supplemented by academic philosophical discussion. The Turing Test represents an early attempt to empirically measure the consciousness of machines, but proves to be inadequate for its intended task. The Chinese room argument is a classical thought experiment which supposedly refutes Strong AI, and, while controversial, provides strong objections against conscious AIs as disembodied, symbol-based programs. Embodied cognition is approached first through the \u201cbrain in a vat\u201d thought exper-iment, and then through a more practical approach which may facilitate philosophical advances over the Chinese room argument.\n\nThe central finding in analyzing these perspectives is that the possibility of Strong AI cannot be conclusively proved or disproved under our current, imperfect understanding of cognition and con-sciousness. Main points that hamper definite conclusions are that that we do not know the necessary boundary conditions for consciousness, and that intelligently behaving AIs or machines possess the problem of other minds in determining whether they are conscious or not.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Paivi Vuorio (paelvuor@jyu.fi) on 2019-10-24T05:26:02Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2019-10-24T05:26:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2019", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "66", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Strong AI", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "artificial consciousness", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Chinese room argument", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "embodied cognition", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Artificial intelligence and other minds : the search for strong AI", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201910244575", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Filosofia", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Philosophy", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "201", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "teko\u00e4ly", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "Turingin testi", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "filosofia", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "artificial intelligence", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "Turing test", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "philosophy", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.okm", "value": "G2", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "okm", "schema": "dc"}]
|