| fullrecord |
[{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Korhonen, Pekka", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Sorsimo, Janette", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2019-06-14T07:30:41Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2019-06-14T07:30:41Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2019", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/64618", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "T\u00e4m\u00e4n tutkielman keski\u00f6ss\u00e4 on YK:n yleiskokouksen suojeluvastuuta koskeva debatti\nvuodelta 2018. Suojeluvastuu on vuonna 2005 YK:n yleiskokouksen hyv\u00e4ksym\u00e4 periaate,\njonka kolme pylv\u00e4st\u00e4 k\u00e4sitt\u00e4v\u00e4t valtion ensisijaisen velvollisuuden puolustaa alueellaan\nolevia ihmisi\u00e4 kansanmurhilta, sotarikoksilta, rikoksilta ihmisyytt\u00e4 vastaan sek\u00e4 etniselt\u00e4\npuhdistukselta. Suojeluvastuu sis\u00e4lt\u00e4\u00e4 my\u00f6s kansainv\u00e4lisen yhteis\u00f6n vastuun avustaa\nvaltioita t\u00e4ytt\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4n oma velvollisuutensa ja ryhty\u00e4 kollektiivisiin toimiin, mik\u00e4li valtio\nep\u00e4onnistuu suojeluvastuunsa kantamisessa. Tutkielmassa k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4 keskustelu on toinen\nvirallinen debatti, joka aiheesta on k\u00e4yty YK:n yleiskokouksessa vuoden 2009 j\u00e4lkeen.\n\nSuojeluvastuun statusta kansainv\u00e4lisen\u00e4 normina on kyseenalaistettu sek\u00e4 valtioiden ett\u00e4\ntutkijoiden taholta. Tutkimuksen teht\u00e4v\u00e4n\u00e4 onkin selvitt\u00e4\u00e4, miten kokoukseen osallistuneet\ntahot m\u00e4\u00e4rittelev\u00e4t suojeluvastuun periaatteen k\u00e4sitteen ja miten ne argumentoivat sen\ntoimeenpanon puolesta ja vastaan. Tutkimusteht\u00e4v\u00e4\u00e4 tarkastellaan normiteorian\nn\u00e4k\u00f6kulmasta retorista luentaa analyysiss\u00e4 hy\u00f6dynt\u00e4en. Aineistona tutkielmassa on YK:n\nyleiskokouksen viralliset istuntop\u00f6yt\u00e4kirjat, joista k\u00e4y ilmi keskusteluun osallistuneiden\npuheenvuorot. Aineistoa analysoidaan Kari Palosen poliittisen luennan k\u00e4sitteen kautta sek\u00e4\nhy\u00f6dynt\u00e4en Roderick P. Hartin versiota Toulminin mallista.\n\nTutkimuksessa k\u00e4y ilmi, ett\u00e4 vaikka debattiin osallistujat p\u00e4\u00e4s\u00e4\u00e4nt\u00f6isesti antavat uudelleen\ntukensa suojeluvastuulle, jakautuvat n\u00e4k\u00f6kannat edelleen sen kolmannen pilarin sek\u00e4\nperiaatteen toimeenpanon osalta. Keskustelun voi n\u00e4hd\u00e4 retorisesta n\u00e4k\u00f6kulmasta\nkonfliktiasetelmana, jolloin keskustelun kulkua ja agendan asettelua pyrkiv\u00e4t m\u00e4\u00e4ritt\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4n\nvuorollaan suojeluvastuuseen skeptisesti suhtautuvat tai sit\u00e4 vastustavat osanottajat ja\nvuorollaan sen puolestapuhujat. Keskusteluun osallistujat m\u00e4\u00e4rittelev\u00e4t suojeluvastuun\nhyvin eri termein eik\u00e4 sit\u00e4 voida keskustelun perusteella sanoa t\u00e4ysin vakiintuneeksi\nglobaaliksi normiksi. Osa sen osa-alueista saa keskustelussa kuitenkin laajaa tukea.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "This thesis examines the UN General Assembly debate on the responsibility to protect\n(known as R2P) held in 2018. R2P is a notion endorsed unanimously by the UN General\nAssembly in 2005. Its three pillars embody the primary responsibility of states to protect\ntheir populations from genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing.\nIt also incorporates the responsibility of the international community to assist states to fulfil\ntheir responsibility and to act collectively if a state manifestly fails to carry out its\nobligations. The debate in focus in this thesis is the second UN General Assembly formal\ndebate on R2P since 2009.\n\nThe status of R2P as a norm has been contested by both states and scholars. The purpose of\nthis thesis is to examine how participants of the 2018 debate define R2P and how they argue\nfor and against its implementation. These research questions are explored from the\nperspective of norm theory and rhetorical criticism. The research material consists of the\nstatements made by participants of the debate and they are retrieved from the UN General\nAssembly Official Records. The analysis is carried out by applying Kari Palonen\u2019s thoughts\non interpreting the political and Rhoderick P. Hart\u2019s modified version of the Toulmin system.\n\nThe results reveal that although participants of the debate primarily reaffirm their\ncommitment to R2P, they continue to disagree over pillar III and implementation of R2P.\nFrom a rhetorical perspective, the debate can be understood as a conflict where both\nproponents of R2P and those states that are sceptical of it or oppose it seek in turn to\ndetermine the premise of the discussion and set the agenda. Participants of the debate define\nR2P in many different terms and based on the discussion it is not possible to call R2P a fully-fledged\nglobal norm. However, some aspects of R2P do receive broad support in the debate.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Paivi Vuorio (paelvuor@jyu.fi) on 2019-06-14T07:30:41Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2019-06-14T07:30:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2019", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "106", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "United Nations", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "General Assembly", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "regional groups", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "debate", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "R2P - a contested concept or a global norm? : a rhetorical analysis of the United Nations General Assembly formal debate on R2P in 2018", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201906143204", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Valtio-oppi", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Political Science", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "1000", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.initiative", "value": "student", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "initiative", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "208", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "retoriikka", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "multilateralismi", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "suvereniteetti", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "normit", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "suojeluvastuu", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "rhetoric", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "multilateralism", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "sovereignty", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "norms", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "responsibility to protect", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.okm", "value": "G2", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "okm", "schema": "dc"}]
|