Does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation?

Ekosysteemipalvelut on otettu käsitteenä kiinteäksi osaksi poliittista ja tieteellistä keskustelua. Ekosysteemipalveluilla tarkoitetaan niitä hyötyjä, joita ihminen saa luonnosta ja ekosysteemeistä, ja käsite on kasvattanut suosiotaan erityisesti luonnonsuojelua koskevassa keskustelussa. On kuitenki...

Täydet tiedot

Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijä: González López, Sonia
Muut tekijät: Matemaattis-luonnontieteellinen tiedekunta, Faculty of Sciences, Bio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitos, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Jyväskylän yliopisto, University of Jyväskylä
Aineistotyyppi: Pro gradu
Kieli:eng
Julkaistu: 2018
Aiheet:
Linkit: https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/60765
_version_ 1833407670879518720
author González López, Sonia
author2 Matemaattis-luonnontieteellinen tiedekunta Faculty of Sciences Bio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitos Department of Biological and Environmental Science Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_facet González López, Sonia Matemaattis-luonnontieteellinen tiedekunta Faculty of Sciences Bio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitos Department of Biological and Environmental Science Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä González López, Sonia Matemaattis-luonnontieteellinen tiedekunta Faculty of Sciences Bio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitos Department of Biological and Environmental Science Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_sort González López, Sonia
datasource_str_mv jyx
description Ekosysteemipalvelut on otettu käsitteenä kiinteäksi osaksi poliittista ja tieteellistä keskustelua. Ekosysteemipalveluilla tarkoitetaan niitä hyötyjä, joita ihminen saa luonnosta ja ekosysteemeistä, ja käsite on kasvattanut suosiotaan erityisesti luonnonsuojelua koskevassa keskustelussa. On kuitenkin kyseenalaista, miten hyvin ekosysteemipalvelujen kaltainen utilitaristinen lähestymistapa onnistuu suojelemaan luonnon monimuotoisuutta. Tämän tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli selvittää, kuinka halukkaita Jyväskylän yliopiston opiskelijat olivat suojelemaan tai hyödyntämään metsäalueita, kun suojelua puoltavat argumentit esitettiin joko utilitaristisesta, ekologisesta tai näitä kahta yhdistelevästä näkökulmasta. Tutkimus toteutettiin internet-kyselyllä, jossa osallistujat vastasivat väittämiin hypoteettisten metsäalueiden suojelusta ja käytöstä, kun metsäalueet kuvailtiin heille satunnaisesti valitusta näkökulmasta. Annetut vastaukset eivät juurikaan poikenneet toisistaan käytetyn näkökulman perusteella, eikä havaituissa eroissa ollut selvää johdonmukaisuutta, Vastauksissa havaittuihin eroihin vaikuttivat ilmeisesti enemmän sellaiset taustamuuttuja kuten metsänomistus ja yleinen suhtautuminen luonnonsuojeluun. Vaikkei tutkimus kyennyt löytämään selviä eroja eri näkökulmien välillä, se toimii esimerkkinä siitä, miten monitieteellisiä lähestymistapoja voidaan soveltaa, kun halutaan löytää toimivia perusteluja luonnonsuojelun edistämiseksi. Toimivien argumenttien löytäminen on ensiarvoisen tärkeää, mikäli uhkaava biodiversiteetin heikkeneminen halutaan pysäyttää. The concept of ecosystem services (ES) has gained a foothold in, both, the scientific and political worlds. ES are the benefits people gain from nature and its diversity in all, and the concept has gained popularity especially when nature conservation is discussed. However, can such utilitarian approach conserve the biodiversity in its various forms? The aim of this study was to find out, how willing the students of the university of Jyväskylä will be to conserve or harvest a forest area, when it was described from either a utilitarian, ecological, or mixed perspective. The study was conducted as an internet survey, in which the participants answered on propositions over the management of three hypothetical forests described from a randomly selected perspective. In the end, there were not many differences in responses between the different perspectives and no clear pattern could be perceived when comparing them. The analyses suggested that such background factors as whether the participant owned forestland or felt strongly about the environmental politics of Finland might have impacted their decisions more strongly than the perspective of the arguments presented to them in the survey. The study highlights the importance of developing interdisciplinary studies to determine, what kind of argumentation should be used when promoting conservation actions. We are, after all, in a hurry to prevent the global biodiversity crisis and the optimal discourse is needed to advance in conservation efforts.
first_indexed 2019-09-20T09:12:51Z
format Pro gradu
free_online_boolean 1
fullrecord [{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Pohjanmies, T\u00e4hti", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Eyvindson, Kyle", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Gonz\u00e1lez L\u00f3pez, Sonia", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2018-12-20T13:01:01Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2018-12-20T13:01:01Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2018", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/60765", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "Ekosysteemipalvelut on otettu k\u00e4sitteen\u00e4 kiinte\u00e4ksi osaksi poliittista ja tieteellist\u00e4 keskustelua. Ekosysteemipalveluilla tarkoitetaan niit\u00e4 hy\u00f6tyj\u00e4, joita ihminen saa luonnosta ja ekosysteemeist\u00e4, ja k\u00e4site on kasvattanut suosiotaan erityisesti luonnonsuojelua koskevassa keskustelussa. On kuitenkin kyseenalaista, miten hyvin ekosysteemipalvelujen kaltainen utilitaristinen l\u00e4hestymistapa onnistuu suojelemaan luonnon monimuotoisuutta. T\u00e4m\u00e4n tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli selvitt\u00e4\u00e4, kuinka halukkaita Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopiston opiskelijat olivat suojelemaan tai hy\u00f6dynt\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4n mets\u00e4alueita, kun suojelua puoltavat argumentit esitettiin joko utilitaristisesta, ekologisesta tai n\u00e4it\u00e4 kahta yhdistelev\u00e4st\u00e4 n\u00e4k\u00f6kulmasta. Tutkimus toteutettiin internet-kyselyll\u00e4, jossa osallistujat vastasivat v\u00e4itt\u00e4miin hypoteettisten mets\u00e4alueiden suojelusta ja k\u00e4yt\u00f6st\u00e4, kun mets\u00e4alueet kuvailtiin heille satunnaisesti valitusta n\u00e4k\u00f6kulmasta. Annetut vastaukset eiv\u00e4t juurikaan poikenneet toisistaan k\u00e4ytetyn n\u00e4k\u00f6kulman perusteella, eik\u00e4 havaituissa eroissa ollut selv\u00e4\u00e4 johdonmukaisuutta, Vastauksissa havaittuihin eroihin vaikuttivat ilmeisesti enemm\u00e4n sellaiset taustamuuttuja kuten mets\u00e4nomistus ja yleinen suhtautuminen luonnonsuojeluun. Vaikkei tutkimus kyennyt l\u00f6yt\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4n selvi\u00e4 eroja eri n\u00e4k\u00f6kulmien v\u00e4lill\u00e4, se toimii esimerkkin\u00e4 siit\u00e4, miten monitieteellisi\u00e4 l\u00e4hestymistapoja voidaan soveltaa, kun halutaan l\u00f6yt\u00e4\u00e4 toimivia perusteluja luonnonsuojelun edist\u00e4miseksi. Toimivien argumenttien l\u00f6yt\u00e4minen on ensiarvoisen t\u00e4rke\u00e4\u00e4, mik\u00e4li uhkaava biodiversiteetin heikkeneminen halutaan pys\u00e4ytt\u00e4\u00e4.", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "The concept of ecosystem services (ES) has gained a foothold in, both, the scientific and political worlds. ES are the benefits people gain from nature and its diversity in all, and the concept has gained popularity especially when nature conservation is discussed. However, can such utilitarian approach conserve the biodiversity in its various forms? The aim of this study was to find out, how willing the students of the university of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4 will be to conserve or harvest a forest area, when it was described from either a utilitarian, ecological, or mixed perspective. The study was conducted as an internet survey, in which the participants answered on propositions over the management of three hypothetical forests described from a randomly selected perspective. In the end, there were not many differences in responses between the different perspectives and no clear pattern could be perceived when comparing them. The analyses suggested that such background factors as whether the participant owned forestland or felt strongly about the environmental politics of Finland might have impacted their decisions more strongly than the perspective of the arguments presented to them in the survey. The study highlights the importance of developing interdisciplinary studies to determine, what kind of argumentation should be used when promoting conservation actions. We are, after all, in a hurry to prevent the global biodiversity crisis and the optimal discourse is needed to advance in conservation efforts.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Paivi Vuorio (paelvuor@jyu.fi) on 2018-12-20T13:01:01Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2018-12-20T13:01:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2018", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "98", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "luonnon itseisarvo", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation?", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201812205288", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Matemaattis-luonnontieteellinen tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Sciences", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Bio- ja ymp\u00e4rist\u00f6tieteiden laitos", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Department of Biological and Environmental Science", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Ecology and evolutionary biology", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "4011", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "kyselytutkimus", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "ymp\u00e4rist\u00f6politiikka", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "ymp\u00e4rist\u00f6etiikka", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "biodiversiteetti", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "luonnonsuojelu", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "ekosysteemipalvelut", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "ekosysteemit", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "mets\u00e4t", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "mets\u00e4nhoito", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "itseisarvo (filosofia)", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "mets\u00e4talous", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "questionnaire survey", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "environmental policy", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "environmental ethics", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "biodiversity", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "nature conservation", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "ecosystem services", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "ecosystems", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "forests", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "silviculture", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "intrinsic value", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "forestry", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.okm", "value": "G2", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "okm", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.accessibilityfeature", "value": "unknown accessibility", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "accessibilityfeature", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.accessibilityfeature", "value": "ei tietoa saavutettavuudesta", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "accessibilityfeature", "schema": "dc"}]
id jyx.123456789_60765
language eng
last_indexed 2025-05-21T20:05:44Z
main_date 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
main_date_str 2018
online_boolean 1
online_urls_str_mv {"url":"https:\/\/jyx.jyu.fi\/bitstreams\/30892296-397e-44d5-9521-b01261a73779\/download","text":"URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201812205288.pdf","source":"jyx","mediaType":"application\/pdf"}
publishDate 2018
record_format qdc
source_str_mv jyx
spellingShingle González López, Sonia Does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation? luonnon itseisarvo Ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia Ecology and evolutionary biology 4011 kyselytutkimus ympäristöpolitiikka ympäristöetiikka biodiversiteetti luonnonsuojelu ekosysteemipalvelut ekosysteemit metsät metsänhoito itseisarvo (filosofia) metsätalous questionnaire survey environmental policy environmental ethics biodiversity nature conservation ecosystem services ecosystems forests silviculture intrinsic value forestry
title Does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation?
title_full Does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation?
title_fullStr Does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation? Does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation?
title_full_unstemmed Does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation? Does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation?
title_short Does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation?
title_sort does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation
title_txtP Does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation?
topic luonnon itseisarvo Ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia Ecology and evolutionary biology 4011 kyselytutkimus ympäristöpolitiikka ympäristöetiikka biodiversiteetti luonnonsuojelu ekosysteemipalvelut ekosysteemit metsät metsänhoito itseisarvo (filosofia) metsätalous questionnaire survey environmental policy environmental ethics biodiversity nature conservation ecosystem services ecosystems forests silviculture intrinsic value forestry
topic_facet 4011 Ecology and evolutionary biology Ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia biodiversiteetti biodiversity ecosystem services ecosystems ekosysteemipalvelut ekosysteemit environmental ethics environmental policy forestry forests intrinsic value itseisarvo (filosofia) kyselytutkimus luonnon itseisarvo luonnonsuojelu metsänhoito metsät metsätalous nature conservation questionnaire survey silviculture ympäristöetiikka ympäristöpolitiikka
url https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/60765 http://www.urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201812205288
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezlopezsonia doestheecosystemservicediscoursesucceedinpromotingnatureconservation