The Nature of Teacher Questioning Roles while Supporting Dialogue and Argumentation

This study examines discourse in physics classes in Finnish lower secondary schools. The goal of the research is to describe how student argumentation can be supported by a variety of teacher discourse, including different communicative approaches and teacher questioning roles. By describing specifi...

Täydet tiedot

Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijä: Kilpelä, Jonathan
Muut tekijät: Kasvatustieteiden ja psykologian tiedekunta, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Kasvatustieteiden laitos, Department of Education, Jyväskylän yliopisto, University of Jyväskylä
Aineistotyyppi: Pro gradu
Kieli:eng
Julkaistu: 2018
Aiheet:
Linkit: https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/58110
_version_ 1826225745073012736
author Kilpelä, Jonathan
author2 Kasvatustieteiden ja psykologian tiedekunta Faculty of Education and Psychology Kasvatustieteiden laitos Department of Education Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_facet Kilpelä, Jonathan Kasvatustieteiden ja psykologian tiedekunta Faculty of Education and Psychology Kasvatustieteiden laitos Department of Education Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä Kilpelä, Jonathan Kasvatustieteiden ja psykologian tiedekunta Faculty of Education and Psychology Kasvatustieteiden laitos Department of Education Jyväskylän yliopisto University of Jyväskylä
author_sort Kilpelä, Jonathan
datasource_str_mv jyx
description This study examines discourse in physics classes in Finnish lower secondary schools. The goal of the research is to describe how student argumentation can be supported by a variety of teacher discourse, including different communicative approaches and teacher questioning roles. By describing specific features of successful episodes of student argumentation, the hope is to convey a more concrete image of effective instruction, inspiring further research, professional development, and self-reflection by practicing teachers. The methodology utilized in this study approached discourse from multiple levels, aiming to describe the nature of communicative acts in a broad sense as well as in a more specific, moment-by-moment fashion. Discourse analysis was performed on four recorded lessons taught by two teachers aimed at supporting dialogicity and argumentation. The analysis included evaluating discourse based on the type of communicative approach used by the teacher, the teachers’ questioning roles, and the level of student argumentation. Lastly, microanalysis of excerpts of the transcript was included to offer closer insights into the nature of teacher/student interactions. The results of the study show that teachers use a variety of questioning roles in their discourse, but also suggest that not all questioning roles were equally effective at supporting student argumentation. Including a greater variety of questioning roles including moderator, coach, and participant was effective in supporting high-level student argumentation. Closer analysis revealed specific tactics that teachers use when playing various roles in the classroom. The study implies that teachers can utilize multiple roles in order to support student argumentation.
first_indexed 2019-08-19T08:21:33Z
format Pro gradu
free_online_boolean 1
fullrecord [{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Viiri, Jouni", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Kilpel\u00e4, Jonathan", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2018-05-25T10:04:48Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2018-05-25T10:04:48Z", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2018", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/58110", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "This study examines discourse in physics classes in Finnish lower secondary schools. The goal of the research is to describe how student argumentation can be supported by a variety of teacher discourse, including different communicative approaches and teacher questioning roles. By describing specific features of successful episodes of student argumentation, the hope is to convey a more concrete image of effective instruction, inspiring further research, professional development, and self-reflection by practicing teachers.\nThe methodology utilized in this study approached discourse from multiple levels, aiming to describe the nature of communicative acts in a broad sense as well as in a more specific, moment-by-moment fashion. Discourse analysis was performed on four recorded lessons taught by two teachers aimed at supporting dialogicity and argumentation. The analysis included evaluating discourse based on the type of communicative approach used by the teacher, the teachers\u2019 questioning roles, and the level of student argumentation. Lastly, microanalysis of excerpts of the transcript was included to offer closer insights into the nature of teacher/student interactions.\nThe results of the study show that teachers use a variety of questioning roles in their discourse, but also suggest that not all questioning roles were equally effective at supporting student argumentation. Including a greater variety of questioning roles including moderator, coach, and participant was effective in supporting high-level student argumentation. Closer analysis revealed specific tactics that teachers use when playing various roles in the classroom. The study implies that teachers can utilize multiple roles in order to support student argumentation.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by Miia Hakanen (mihakane@jyu.fi) on 2018-05-25T10:04:48Z\nNo. of bitstreams: 0", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-25T10:04:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0\n Previous issue date: 2018", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "78", "language": "", "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Argumentation", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Dialogicity", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Science teaching", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Teacher roles of questioning", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "The Nature of Teacher Questioning Roles while Supporting Dialogue and Argumentation", "language": "", "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201805252781", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Kasvatustieteiden ja psykologian tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Education and Psychology", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Kasvatustieteiden laitos", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Department of Education", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Master's Degree Programme in Education", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Master's Degree Programme in Education", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "102", "language": "", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}]
id jyx.123456789_58110
language eng
last_indexed 2025-02-18T10:55:31Z
main_date 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
main_date_str 2018
online_boolean 1
online_urls_str_mv {"url":"https:\/\/jyx.jyu.fi\/bitstreams\/167ff2e0-1535-4930-8f17-0084f665a0f3\/download","text":"URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201805252781.pdf","source":"jyx","mediaType":"application\/pdf"}
publishDate 2018
record_format qdc
source_str_mv jyx
spellingShingle Kilpelä, Jonathan The Nature of Teacher Questioning Roles while Supporting Dialogue and Argumentation Argumentation Dialogicity Science teaching Teacher roles of questioning Master's Degree Programme in Education 102
title The Nature of Teacher Questioning Roles while Supporting Dialogue and Argumentation
title_full The Nature of Teacher Questioning Roles while Supporting Dialogue and Argumentation
title_fullStr The Nature of Teacher Questioning Roles while Supporting Dialogue and Argumentation The Nature of Teacher Questioning Roles while Supporting Dialogue and Argumentation
title_full_unstemmed The Nature of Teacher Questioning Roles while Supporting Dialogue and Argumentation The Nature of Teacher Questioning Roles while Supporting Dialogue and Argumentation
title_short The Nature of Teacher Questioning Roles while Supporting Dialogue and Argumentation
title_sort nature of teacher questioning roles while supporting dialogue and argumentation
title_txtP The Nature of Teacher Questioning Roles while Supporting Dialogue and Argumentation
topic Argumentation Dialogicity Science teaching Teacher roles of questioning Master's Degree Programme in Education 102
topic_facet 102 Argumentation Dialogicity Master's Degree Programme in Education Science teaching Teacher roles of questioning
url https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/58110 http://www.urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201805252781
work_keys_str_mv AT kilpeläjonathan natureofteacherquestioningroleswhilesupportingdialogueandargumentation AT kilpeläjonathan thenatureofteacherquestioningroleswhilesupportingdialogueandargumentation