Adapting Net Promoter thinking in public sector organizations

Tässä maisterintutkielmassa tarkasteltiin Net Promoter score (NPS) -suosittelumittarin sopivuutta julkissektorin käyttöön. Tutkielman tavoitteena oli selvittää, sopiiko yksityisellä sektorilla paljon käytetty mittari julkissektorin organisaatioihin. Tutkimus täyttää aukon tutkimuskentällä, jossa NPS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hakola, Juho
Other Authors: Humanistinen tiedekunta, Faculty of Humanities, Viestintätieteiden laitos, Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylän yliopisto
Format: Master's thesis
Language:eng
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access: https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/51426
_version_ 1826225765328355328
author Hakola, Juho
author2 Humanistinen tiedekunta Faculty of Humanities Viestintätieteiden laitos Department of Communication University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylän yliopisto
author_facet Hakola, Juho Humanistinen tiedekunta Faculty of Humanities Viestintätieteiden laitos Department of Communication University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylän yliopisto Hakola, Juho Humanistinen tiedekunta Faculty of Humanities Viestintätieteiden laitos Department of Communication University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylän yliopisto
author_sort Hakola, Juho
datasource_str_mv jyx
description Tässä maisterintutkielmassa tarkasteltiin Net Promoter score (NPS) -suosittelumittarin sopivuutta julkissektorin käyttöön. Tutkielman tavoitteena oli selvittää, sopiiko yksityisellä sektorilla paljon käytetty mittari julkissektorin organisaatioihin. Tutkimus täyttää aukon tutkimuskentällä, jossa NPS:ää on tutkittu paljon yksityisen sektorin organisaatioissa, mutta tutkimusta julkissektorilta ei tiettävästi ole tehty. Tutkimuskysymykset olivat: 1) Millaisia piirteitä julkissektorin suosittelijoilla on; 2) millaisia piirteitä julkissektorin herjaajilla on; 3) millaisia piirteitä julkissektorin passiiveilla on. Teoreettinen viitekehys käsittelee julkissektorin maine- ja tyytyväisyysmittareita sekä julkissektorin erityispiirteitä. Tutkimus oli määrällinen tutkimus, jonka aineistona oli julkissektorin mainemittaustutkimus. Aineistossa oli 1198 vastaajaa, ja aineisto on kerätty vuonna 2014. Teorian pohjalta muodostettiin yhteensä kahdeksan hypoteesia, jotka testattiin analyysivaiheessa. Aineiston analyysi toteutettiin määrällisin menetelmin. Kahdeksasta hypoteesista kuusi vahvistettiin. Tutkimuksessa todettiin, että julkissektori tarvitsee oman mittarinsa tyytyväisyyden ja maineen mittaamiseen. Lisäksi tulokset vahvistivat aiempia käsityksiä Net Promoter scoren tarpeellisuudesta. Tärkeimpänä tutkimustuloksena esitettiin julkissektorin oma NPS eli public sector Net Promoter score (PSNPS). PSNPS esittää, että julkissektorin erityispiirteiden mukaisesti passiivit lasketaan promoottorien kategoriaan. Tutkimus avaa keskustelua julkissektorin asiakastyytyväisyyden ja maineen mittaamisen. Tämä oli tiedettävästi ensimmäinen aiheesta tehty tutkimus, joten se tarvitsee vielä lisätutkimusta ollakseen sovellettavissa julkissektorin organisaatioihin. Tutkimus toimii hyvänä keskustelunavaajana jatkotutkimukselle, vaikka tutkimustulokset This masters’ thesis discussed the Net Promoter score (NPS) recommendation tools use in public sector context. The aim of this research was to examine the characteristics of NPS in public sector and its validity. The research fills a gap in the field of research where NPS is widely used in private organizations but is reportedly farely unknown in public sector. Furthermore no previous research on the topic was found. The research questions were: 1) What characteristics do public sector promoters have; 2) what characteristics do public sector detractors have and; 3) what characteristics do public sector passives have. Theoretical framework examines reputation and satisfaction measuring in public sector organizations and special features of public sector communication. The research data is a public sector reputation survey gathered in 2014. Data consists of 1198 respondents. According to theory eight hypotheses were constructed and tested in analysis. Data analysis was done by statistical methods, therefore this is a quantitative research. Six of the hypotheses were confirmed and two disconfirmed. The research claims that public sector needs its own tool to measure satisfaction and reputation. Moreover the results confirm that NPS is in fact a needed tool. The most important result of this research is public sectors’ own Net Promoter score (PSNPS) that claims that passives are counted in promoter pool according the special need of public sector. This research works as a discussion opener in public sector customer satisfaction and reputation measuring. This research is reportedly the first research to examine NPS in public sector and still needs more research before implications can be made for public sector organizations. Eventhough the results are not fully applicable this research works as an opener for scientific discussion of the topic.
first_indexed 2023-03-22T10:00:19Z
format Pro gradu
free_online_boolean 1
fullrecord [{"key": "dc.contributor.advisor", "value": "Luoma-aho, Vilma", "language": "", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "advisor", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.author", "value": "Hakola, Juho", "language": null, "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "author", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.accessioned", "value": "2016-09-22T09:05:51Z", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "accessioned", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.available", "value": "2016-09-22T09:05:51Z", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "available", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.issued", "value": "2016", "language": null, "element": "date", "qualifier": "issued", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.other", "value": "oai:jykdok.linneanet.fi:1574638", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.uri", "value": "https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/51426", "language": "", "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "uri", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "T\u00e4ss\u00e4 maisterintutkielmassa tarkasteltiin Net Promoter score (NPS) -suosittelumittarin sopivuutta julkissektorin k\u00e4ytt\u00f6\u00f6n. Tutkielman tavoitteena oli selvitt\u00e4\u00e4, sopiiko yksityisell\u00e4 sektorilla paljon k\u00e4ytetty mittari julkissektorin organisaatioihin. Tutkimus t\u00e4ytt\u00e4\u00e4 aukon tutkimuskent\u00e4ll\u00e4, jossa NPS:\u00e4\u00e4 on tutkittu paljon yksityisen sektorin organisaatioissa, mutta tutkimusta julkissektorilta ei tiett\u00e4v\u00e4sti ole tehty.\r\nTutkimuskysymykset olivat: 1) Millaisia piirteit\u00e4 julkissektorin suosittelijoilla on; 2) millaisia piirteit\u00e4 julkissektorin herjaajilla on; 3) millaisia piirteit\u00e4 julkissektorin passiiveilla on. Teoreettinen viitekehys k\u00e4sittelee julkissektorin maine- ja tyytyv\u00e4isyysmittareita sek\u00e4 julkissektorin erityispiirteit\u00e4.\r\nTutkimus oli m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4llinen tutkimus, jonka aineistona oli julkissektorin mainemittaustutkimus. Aineistossa oli 1198 vastaajaa, ja aineisto on ker\u00e4tty vuonna 2014. Teorian pohjalta muodostettiin yhteens\u00e4 kahdeksan hypoteesia, jotka testattiin analyysivaiheessa. Aineiston analyysi toteutettiin m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4llisin menetelmin. Kahdeksasta hypoteesista kuusi vahvistettiin.\r\nTutkimuksessa todettiin, ett\u00e4 julkissektori tarvitsee oman mittarinsa tyytyv\u00e4isyyden ja maineen mittaamiseen. Lis\u00e4ksi tulokset vahvistivat aiempia k\u00e4sityksi\u00e4 Net Promoter scoren tarpeellisuudesta. T\u00e4rkeimp\u00e4n\u00e4 tutkimustuloksena esitettiin julkissektorin oma NPS eli public sector Net Promoter score (PSNPS). PSNPS esitt\u00e4\u00e4, ett\u00e4 julkissektorin erityispiirteiden mukaisesti passiivit lasketaan promoottorien kategoriaan.\r\nTutkimus avaa keskustelua julkissektorin asiakastyytyv\u00e4isyyden ja maineen mittaamisen. T\u00e4m\u00e4 oli tiedett\u00e4v\u00e4sti ensimm\u00e4inen aiheesta tehty tutkimus, joten se tarvitsee viel\u00e4 lis\u00e4tutkimusta ollakseen sovellettavissa julkissektorin organisaatioihin. Tutkimus toimii hyv\u00e4n\u00e4 keskustelunavaajana jatkotutkimukselle, vaikka tutkimustulokset", "language": "fi", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.abstract", "value": "This masters\u2019 thesis discussed the Net Promoter score (NPS) recommendation tools use in public sector context. The aim of this research was to examine the characteristics of NPS in public sector and its validity. The research fills a gap in the field of research where NPS is widely used in private organizations but is reportedly farely unknown in public sector. Furthermore no previous research on the topic was found.\r\nThe research questions were: 1) What characteristics do public sector promoters have; 2) what characteristics do public sector detractors have and; 3) what characteristics do public sector passives have. Theoretical framework examines reputation and satisfaction measuring in public sector organizations and special features of public sector communication.\r\nThe research data is a public sector reputation survey gathered in 2014. Data consists of 1198 respondents. According to theory eight hypotheses were constructed and tested in analysis. Data analysis was done by statistical methods, therefore this is a quantitative research. Six of the hypotheses were confirmed and two disconfirmed.\r\nThe research claims that public sector needs its own tool to measure satisfaction and reputation. Moreover the results confirm that NPS is in fact a needed tool. The most important result of this research is public sectors\u2019 own Net Promoter score (PSNPS) that claims that passives are counted in promoter pool according the special need of public sector.\r\nThis research works as a discussion opener in public sector customer satisfaction and reputation measuring. This research is reportedly the first research to examine NPS in public sector and still needs more research before implications can be made for public sector organizations. Eventhough the results are not fully applicable this research works as an opener for scientific discussion of the topic.", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "abstract", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted using Plone Publishing form by Juho Hakola (jumahako) on 2016-09-22 09:05:51.119239. Form: Pro gradu -lomake (https://kirjasto.jyu.fi/julkaisut/julkaisulomakkeet/pro-gradu-lomake). JyX data: [jyx_publishing-allowed (fi) =True]", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Submitted by jyx lomake-julkaisija (jyx-julkaisija.group@korppi.jyu.fi) on 2016-09-22T09:05:51Z\r\nNo. of bitstreams: 2\r\nURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201609224181.pdf: 1387043 bytes, checksum: 88aa29946a741f0c831c52192d309a75 (MD5)\r\nlicense.html: 4813 bytes, checksum: 49295fc59484f8dc36cb4937887d41c8 (MD5)", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.description.provenance", "value": "Made available in DSpace on 2016-09-22T09:05:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2\r\nURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201609224181.pdf: 1387043 bytes, checksum: 88aa29946a741f0c831c52192d309a75 (MD5)\r\nlicense.html: 4813 bytes, checksum: 49295fc59484f8dc36cb4937887d41c8 (MD5)\r\n Previous issue date: 2016", "language": "en", "element": "description", "qualifier": "provenance", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.extent", "value": "1 verkkoaineisto (59 sivua)", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "extent", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.mimetype", "value": "application/pdf", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "mimetype", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.language.iso", "value": "eng", "language": null, "element": "language", "qualifier": "iso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights", "value": "In Copyright", "language": "en", "element": "rights", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Net Promoter score", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Public sector organizations", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.other", "value": "Satisfaction measuring", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "other", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.title", "value": "Adapting Net Promoter thinking in public sector organizations", "language": null, "element": "title", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type", "value": "master thesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": null, "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.identifier.urn", "value": "URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201609224181", "language": null, "element": "identifier", "qualifier": "urn", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Pro gradu -tutkielma", "language": "fi", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.ontasot", "value": "Master\u2019s thesis", "language": "en", "element": "type", "qualifier": "ontasot", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Humanistinen tiedekunta", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.faculty", "value": "Faculty of Humanities", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "faculty", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Viestint\u00e4tieteiden laitos", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.department", "value": "Department of Communication", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "department", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "University of Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4", "language": "en", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.contributor.organization", "value": "Jyv\u00e4skyl\u00e4n yliopisto", "language": "fi", "element": "contributor", "qualifier": "organization", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Yhteis\u00f6viestint\u00e4", "language": "fi", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.discipline", "value": "Organizational Communication", "language": "en", "element": "subject", "qualifier": "discipline", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.date.updated", "value": "2016-09-22T09:05:52Z", "language": "", "element": "date", "qualifier": "updated", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "yvv.contractresearch.funding", "value": "0", "language": "", "element": "contractresearch", "qualifier": "funding", "schema": "yvv"}, {"key": "dc.type.coar", "value": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "coar", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.accesslevel", "value": "openAccess", "language": "fi", "element": "rights", "qualifier": "accesslevel", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.publication", "value": "masterThesis", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "publication", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.oppiainekoodi", "value": "3131", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "oppiainekoodi", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "julkinen sektori", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "julkisuuskuva", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "asiakastyytyv\u00e4isyys", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.subject.yso", "value": "mittaus", "language": null, "element": "subject", "qualifier": "yso", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.format.content", "value": "fulltext", "language": null, "element": "format", "qualifier": "content", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.rights.url", "value": "https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/", "language": null, "element": "rights", "qualifier": "url", "schema": "dc"}, {"key": "dc.type.okm", "value": "G2", "language": null, "element": "type", "qualifier": "okm", "schema": "dc"}]
id jyx.123456789_51426
language eng
last_indexed 2025-02-18T10:55:57Z
main_date 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
main_date_str 2016
online_boolean 1
online_urls_str_mv {"url":"https:\/\/jyx.jyu.fi\/bitstreams\/31345de5-facc-4443-9a5e-af3e7b1813d2\/download","text":"URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201609224181.pdf","source":"jyx","mediaType":"application\/pdf"}
publishDate 2016
record_format qdc
source_str_mv jyx
spellingShingle Hakola, Juho Adapting Net Promoter thinking in public sector organizations Net Promoter score Public sector organizations Satisfaction measuring Yhteisöviestintä Organizational Communication 3131 julkinen sektori julkisuuskuva asiakastyytyväisyys mittaus
title Adapting Net Promoter thinking in public sector organizations
title_full Adapting Net Promoter thinking in public sector organizations
title_fullStr Adapting Net Promoter thinking in public sector organizations Adapting Net Promoter thinking in public sector organizations
title_full_unstemmed Adapting Net Promoter thinking in public sector organizations Adapting Net Promoter thinking in public sector organizations
title_short Adapting Net Promoter thinking in public sector organizations
title_sort adapting net promoter thinking in public sector organizations
title_txtP Adapting Net Promoter thinking in public sector organizations
topic Net Promoter score Public sector organizations Satisfaction measuring Yhteisöviestintä Organizational Communication 3131 julkinen sektori julkisuuskuva asiakastyytyväisyys mittaus
topic_facet 3131 Net Promoter score Organizational Communication Public sector organizations Satisfaction measuring Yhteisöviestintä asiakastyytyväisyys julkinen sektori julkisuuskuva mittaus
url https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/51426 http://www.urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201609224181
work_keys_str_mv AT hakolajuho adaptingnetpromoterthinkinginpublicsectororganizations